Theologians Think They’re Smarter Than Stephen Hawking

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Free Thinker, Apr 24, 2012.

  1. Things are not so fine-tuned for life on Mercury. There is no life within a black hole. No birds fly at the edge the galaxy. Given a multitude of conditions, at least one will prove suitable. If the conditions weren't conducive to life anywhere, there would be no-one to think how bad the conditions are.

    Everything works together perfectly because it (the universe) was all one and the same at one time. A shattered marble of many different shaped bits can be reassembled into one no matter how many times the bits are broken. Are the bits fine-tuned ? No, they are just all from the same thing thus they fit together.
     
    #71     Apr 25, 2012
  2. That's what he says about "God" believers and evolution deniers.
     
    #72     Apr 25, 2012
  3. Oh man that's funny. A complete airhead judging one of the great minds of our time. Your not smart enough to mow Hawking's lawn.
    If your brain was a body, it would look like his.
     
    #73     Apr 26, 2012
  4. stu

    stu

    Oh dear.
    3rd time of trying. Seriously? You can’t surely expect to be taken seriously if you're always going to be that ridiculous. Although of course religion does rely an awful lot on the utterly ridiculous.

    Try it this way then.
    Evolving universes signify............the values of cosmological constants.......would be inevitable. That does not say ".... evolving universes signify their values".
    In that event, evolution, evolving universes, would be the natural process by which values eventually arrive at the values they do. An inevitability.

    You are too brain locked with the predisposition for a creator god. Always driving everything towards a pre-conclusion. It is the antithesis of science.
     
    #74     Apr 26, 2012
  5. stu

    stu

    You're always so angry and abusive. Sign of a lost argument and poor personality.
    I think people like you and the likes of Lucrum must suffer from a form of inverted intellectualism, where you think it's clever or somehow superior to be ignorant.

    You can't even read a simple sentence without getting it wrong , so there's no way you're going to be able to use any of Stephen Hawking's stuff properly, as evidenced in this thread and many others.

    futurecurrents's marble analogy is a good one, and you should try to understand it, especially in context to the word 'multiverse', instead of blathering around stuff you clearly have no clue about.

    Go get some counseling on those anger and abuse issues too.
     
    #75     Apr 26, 2012
  6. oh man you just ran off the road, using future currents as some sort of reference:D
     
    #76     Apr 26, 2012
  7. Think, Simpsons, or Family Guy. They have been trained that dumb is good.

    But in their heart of hearts, they no this is a failed philosophy, but it is too late to do anything about it, hence, the anger. I would be pissed too if I saw the man behind curtain too late to do anything about it.
    :D
     
    #77     Apr 26, 2012
  8. jem

    jem

    another example of an et atheist mind.

    I post quotes from top scientists speaking of tuning of the cosmological constant to dozens of decimal places and we get responses like mercury is hot.
     
    #78     Apr 27, 2012
  9. jem

    jem

    Stu - if you were not abusive first.. I would not be abusive towards you.

    Although this is abusive to your argument.



    <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/mlD-CJPGt1A?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    #79     Apr 27, 2012
  10. 377OHMS

    377OHMS

    Never watched either, not one episode. Not sure what to think about adults who watch cartoons.
     
    #80     Apr 27, 2012