It makes a difference if people are speaking without a factual basis and only using feelings and false memories. It makes no difference if this is nothing whatsoever more than a way for you to relax. Scratching your balls as it were like mouthing about a football team. This is more serious than deflate-gate but it seems only marginally if at all to many on the right unencumbered by objective reality.
FWIW the "Mueller" investigation was a formalisation and up-scaling of an earlier investigation called "Crossfire Hurricane". This was picked some say as it was a play on Trump using "You can't always get what you want" and the end song (against the Stone's wishes) at his campaign rallies. The code name is drawn from the opening stanza of 'Jumpin' Jack Flash.' 'I was born in a cross-fire hurricane; And I howled at the morning driving rain... But it's all right now, in fact, it's a gas. But it's all right. I'm Jumpin' Jack Flash. It's a gas, gas, gas,' https://www.thenationalherald.com/1...k-ambassador-set-off-fbis-trump-russia-probe/
If I'm understanding your position correctly you're claiming that on election day Trump pulls off an unexpected victory. Next morning the country wakes up and democrats say, well, we fought the good fight but lost, we'll give it another try in 2020. Then the republican congress said, hey wait a minute, we're not sure Trump won this fair and square, the Russkies may have meddled and Trump actually might have colluded with them. And then the republicans all by themselves decided to launch an investigation?
Are you even aware of what Obama's DNI stated on CNN? https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/russia-trump-collusion-investigation/ But don't take our word for it. Here's what Obama's Director of National Intelligence, the nation's former spy master, James Clapper, told CNN's Anderson Cooper: "If it weren't for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of event which are still unfolding today, including Special Counsel (Robert) Mueller's investigation. President Obama is responsible for that. It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place." Why didn't this get more attention in the media? Obama and Brennan not only knew the dubious nature of the allegations against Trump, but pushed them anyway. As Kimberley Strassel wrote in the Wall Street Journal, Brennan in particular has revealed himself to be a total anti-Trump partisan to an extent that's shocking for a public official. His animus is raw and deep, as his actions suggest. "The record shows (Brennan) went on to use his position — as head of the most powerful spy agency in the world — to assist Hillary Clinton's campaign (and keep his job)," Kimberley Strassel wrote last week in the Wall Street Journal. Brennan's manic partisanship could be seen last week in an over-the-top, bizarrely unhinged tweet following Trump's press conference after his mini-summit with Vladimir Putin. Brennan called Trump's remarks "nothing short of treasonous" and said they exceeded "the threshold of 'high crimes & misdemeanors.' "
It did, by NYT themselves - last year. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html Another fail
You are either confused or purposely conflating the post election period with the campaign period. We are not talking about the last days of the administration we are talking about Obama starting the inquiry pre - election. Pre - FISA warrant. Your article begins: WASHINGTON — In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government.