I have to agree. The left has painted such a horrible portrait of what Trump 'has said', many people are in the closet. The good news for Trump is that he can still 'say X' to undo some of the damage. For Hillary it is different, it's all about what she 'has done' or 'not done'. A little more difficult to undo.
Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory Jim Hoft Aug 7th, 2016 8:30 am 408 Comments Guest Post by Joe Hoft Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slander that Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide! It’s evident Hillary has a hard time filling a Union Hall while Trump regularly turns people away from his stadium and arena venues. Now this – Analysis from social media provides additional support that Trump is likely to win in a landslide. So how bad is it? Evidence from ‘The Truth Division’ shows that if you look at social media, Trump is killing Hillary! Facebook Trump: 10,174,358 Likes Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes Trump has nearly double the amount of ‘Likes’ that Clinton has! When comparing recent ‘live streams’ on Facebook: Trump Live Stream Post — 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views Clinton Live Stream Post —11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views Trump is crushing Clinton. Twitter Trump: 10.6 million followers Hillary: 8.1 million followers Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history. Who knows if Hillary followers are even real? Youtube Live Stream Trump: Averages 30,000 live viewers per stream Clinton: Averages 500 live viewers per stream Trump has 5900% more live viewers than Clinton. That’s plain devastation! Instagram Trump: 2.2 million followers Clinton: 1.8 million followers Trump has 22% more Instagram followers. Reddit Trump: 197,696 subscribers Hillary: 24,429 subscribers Hillary for Prison: 55,228 subscribers Hillary for Prison’s Reddit feed has more than double subscribers of Hillary’s Reddit page, equating to Trump having 700% more Reddit subscribers. Hillary is proving that she is a terrible candidate. No one likes her and no one trusts her. Based on turnouts at campaign events and on social media, if the election were today… Trump would likely win in a Landslide! http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/evidence-trump-landslide/
USATODAY: Trump vs. Clinton: how the rivals rank on Twitter, Facebook, more A closer look at the candidates on social media: Twitter: The numbers. Trump, who started the campaign with 4 million followers, now has over 10.6 million, while Clinton, who began with about 1 million, now has 8.1 million. Trump has posted 32,800 tweets; Clinton has just 7,260 tweets to her name. The style. Trump types out opinions (“Obama will go down as the worst president ever”) and re-tweets articles that he agrees with, some from publications like theWashington Post or Daily Mail, and other times from extreme right-wing publications that have included white supremacist organizations. He retweets comments from actor James Woods and conservative commentator Ann Coulter. His retweets are sometimes a source of controversy. Trump, who usually refers to the democratic candidate as "Crooked Hillary," deleted a tweet aftersome complained about the use of a Jewish star in the image, calling it anti-semitic, and noting the same image was used on a neo-Nazi message board. His tweets also directs folks to rallies and posts videos and photos from the events. “No one has ever beaten or come close to Trump when it comes to Twitter,” Cornfield says. Clinton uses her @hillaryclinton handle to post pictures from rallies, retweet negative Trump coverage from CNN and CNBC, retweet critical stuff about Trump (including a recent blast from Ohio governor John Kasich), photos and videos from her rallies and bus trip across the mid-west, and quotes from the candidate, which appear to be pulled from her stump speech. To his constant blasts, Clinton often doesn't respond, but has urged him to "Delete your account," Twitter speak for "Shut up." Clinton has taken some ground by more often using visuals with her tweets, however. Cornfield notes Clinton got more retweets of her message during the Democratic convention than the Republicans did, by using tweets with images and videos from the event. He published his findings on Medium. Offering the personal touch has clearly helped Trump greatly grow his audience. But what works for one candidate may not work for another. “Stream of consciousness tweets appeal to a different type of voter, the Trump voter,” says DeMeers of Audience Bloom. “She’s taking a calculated risk to not go there.” Facebook: The numbers.Trump has 10 million likes to Clinton's 5.2 million. The style. Trump is more visual here than on Twitter, with graphics that support his views, short videos talking directly to the camera, complete texts of press releases, photos from rallies and the occasional rant. “CNN will soon be the least trusted name in news if they continue to be the press shop for Hillary Clinton!” said one post. Clinton’s Facebook re-runs quotes (with photos) from convention and rally speeches, re-postings of Trump gaffes from ABC News and others, behind the scenes photos and campaign ads. In this presidential cycle, it’s all about Twitter, despite Facebook having a much larger audience (1.6 billion to just over 300 million for Twitter.) Because the Facebook algorithm only reaches a portion of the audience at any given time (mainly friends or followers), Twitter is seen as the way “to reach the press, influencers and policy makers,” since it’s a public forum that doesn’t require registration to read, says Alan Rosenblatt, a senior vice-president of political communications firm Turner4D. YouTube: The numbers. Clinton's YouTube channel has 16 million views and 64,000 subscribers, to Trump's 8 million and 45,000 subscribers. Clinton offers 179 videos here, everything from president Barack Obama endorsing her, tributes to Clinton’s mom and being a grandmother and a “Quick Question” series with soft, human interest Q&As on topics like best advice from her mother and what it was like moving her daughter to the college dorm. She also showcases clips from the convention, (the same ones seen on Facebook) and campaign speech highlights. The most viewed video is the 2 minute “I’m running,” video she used to announce the campaign, with nearly 5 million views. Trump’s most viewed video is a short excerpt from him introducing vice-presidential running mate Mike Pence at a press conference, with just over 2 million views. The 43 videos in total feature campaign ads, Trump talking directly to the camera about issues, complete speeches from rallies and short attack ads against Clinton. Clinton has a stronger following on YouTube because “she posts more often,” says Turner4D's Rosenblatt. And with more campaign cash at her disposal and a larger staff, she has the resources to produce more slick videos, which can be shared to Facebook, Instagram and other outlets. Instagram: The candidates--2.2 million for Trump vs. 1.8 million for Clinton, use this platform to post photos and videos, the same ones that have been seen on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. The difference is they are in the square format of Instagram, and often have text graphics as well. Instagram, which has 500 million daily users, is seen as a play for the youth vote for the candidates. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...a-twitter-facobook-youtube-snapchat/87974630/
That's why Trump can now foresee and believe the election results would be a rigged one due to a rigged system! By organising/sending his personal observers! QuickTake Q&A: Trump’s Warnings About a ‘Rigged’ Election (August 22, 2016): http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...-q-a-trump-s-warnings-about-a-rigged-election Why Donald Trump’s Election Observers Are a Bad Idea (By JON GRINSPANAUG. 24, 2016 ) : http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/why-donald-trumps-election-observers-are-a-bad-idea.html Aug 23 2016, 12:34 pm ET Donald Trump's Poll-Watching Talk Spurs Call for International Monitors of U.S. Election: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...alk-spurs-call-international-monitors-n636136
What do you expect? How can you blame him? After what the DNC's criminal behavior towards Bernie? Nobody went to jail, but someone GOT PROMOTED. And this: "Interestingly, much information has recently come to light about the Clinton candidacy. Notably, the hacker Guccifer 2.0 released documents which he took from the computer network of the Democratic National Committee. Among these files, one tabulated a list of big-money donors to the Clinton Foundation. One fact has gone unreported in the media: Two of the three companies that control the electronic voting market, namely Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. Hart Intercivic), are in this list of big-money donors." http://www.caucus99percent.com/cont...ities-tied-e-voting-machine-companies-donated Democrats seem to lack a sense of what following 'the law' means. Here is more proof: You seem like an honest type of person. Perhaps you should join the Republican party.
I don't know where this type of question should be put: Is Donald Trump really a deca-billionnaire, or some are wondering even a billionnaire ? How can we find out what is the truth ?
"To Whom My Concern", after reading today's news very carefully, may be found actually Not a typo at all, as contrary to many initially would have guessed! It clearly states "To Whom, My Concern"! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/27/donald-trump-doctor-letter-health-harold-bornstein https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...onald-trumps-doctor-letter-just-got-stranger/
WikiLeaks founder says the problem with leaking material about Trump is that nothing can compare with 'what comes out of Donald Trump's mouth' Julian Assange said WikiLeaks has 'some information' about Trump's campaign but he can't compete with what the candidate himself says WikiLeaks has published more than 20,000 documents related to Hillary Clinton, mostly her State Department emails Assange said Clinton hasn't been attacked enough for spearheading regime change in Libya He spoke to 'Fox & Friends' from the Ecuadorean embassy in London where he has been holed up for more than five years fighting extradition on a rape allegation in Sweden http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Trump-compare-comes-Donald-Trump-s-mouth.html