The Surf Report

Discussion in 'Journals' started by marketsurfer, Apr 25, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. post from A1

    "Then you start looking at the historical movements of your market. You start looking for factors that precede the historic highs and lows and finally you get a clue, and that clue is that historic highs and lows "turning points" are proceeded by changes in volume that signal institutional participation. It certainly aint you clowns that move markets. Who else could it be?"
    ***
    LOL, I can't believe this guy (keeping it clean Surf) is still posting here (didn't he say "Bye" with his first egregious post?:confused: )
    ***
    The thing is, to try to bring the Journal back to what Magna dearly wants it to be ... trading, I actually never look at historical data at all when I'm trading anything, hence the mistake with posting the historicals.

    I like to keep my attention on the present, with an eye to the future, and here is what I see now for the Pair (red arrow at top shows the turn of the market, red bar at the bottom shows the duration of move).

    Good trading - especially you Surf, you're light years beyond most of these goombas.

    Jimmy Jam
     
    #4241     Apr 15, 2007
  2. Corelio

    Corelio

    Indeed you have captured the essence of my statement with this sentence.

    Something of extreme importance for those that adopt a martingale style.


    Regards
    Corelio
     
    #4242     Apr 15, 2007

  3. thanks for the erudite and thought provoking posts, corelio. good points all.

    nice to see you here!

    regards,
    surf
     
    #4243     Apr 15, 2007
  4. #4244     Apr 15, 2007

  5. taleb is an academic, teaching is in his blood. i wouldn't call it rationing knowledge for dollars. its what he loves to do/


    as you know, empirica shut its original fund down, and is currently operating as a think tank/ FOF/ hedging operation of some sort.

    do you have any details about the truth of what happened to the original empirica?

    surf
     
    #4245     Apr 15, 2007
  6. Ok, that makes sense. Thanks! Give microstructure (or me :)) several years before it changes the microstructural problems in the FX market.

    Good to see your journal is back and happenin, ET-style. Good luck with your trades, and as always, <i> I </i> will see <i> YOU </i> and your fat fingers in marketannasurferland :)

    more warmly,
    anna
     
    #4246     Apr 15, 2007

  7. thanks, anna. my # 1 quant girl-- always a pleasure with you, all ways!

    several firms such as MBtrading have attempted to narrow the spread by charging a commission--others like hotspot adopted the ECN model. still seems that the typical wide spread dealer is thriving--not sure why or how. eventually, i believe trader education will force them to change to the no/limited spread plus commission model. otherwise, they just wont survive with an educated trader base--- free TA charts, etc. just doesnt cut it any longer.

    surf
     
    #4247     Apr 16, 2007
  8. Hotspot is independent of Currenex -- they're direct competitors.
     
    #4248     Apr 16, 2007
  9. correct. your on top of things, atticus.

    do you think the typical FX retail dealer is on the way out?

    surf
     
    #4249     Apr 16, 2007
  10. They (dealers) fill a niche. CME/Reuters will appeal to those who trade the majors with futures accounts. Those trading the exotic pairs will stick to dealers and the ECNs.
     
    #4250     Apr 16, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.