No, I had nothing to do with the account spoofed in my firms name. Feel free to contact C2 for verification. In fact, I have never sold puts on anything
??? If Pekelo had committed a crime wouldn't he be in jail, a law suit been filed or at least banned from this site instead of still posting here? I mean, I'm just asking.
smurf do you know how to read? Buying GOOG puts right before earnings is the only strategy you have ever employed. You swing for a home run every time and lose on just about all of them. It was you. The truth will set you free.
The only "crime" Pekelo committed was in finding the c2 account and exposing and embarassing smurf (if that's possible).
It has nothing to do with this site and how do you know no action was taken? C2 quickly took care of the situation to our satisfaction.
An account was opened in the name of my firm, that doesn't even trade itself, in an effort to discredit. C2 has since instituted safeguards to make this chicanery more difficult.
Liar liar pants on fire. There was no "effort to discredit". A trade was put on c2 and it could have worked or it could have failed. It failed. Of course, if GOOG earnings disappointed and the stock tanked, smurf would have taken all the credit for the great trade. You swing for the fences on every paper trade you make, but somehow you are still trying to have us believe this home run swing wasn't yours? You are a joke.
The issue wasn't the trade, I could care less about that. It was the fact that the name of my firm was used--- a firm actively managing multiple millions USD--- as the owner of the spoofed account. Like I said, we immediately took action managing the attack. In fact, I had forgotten all about it until now. Surf