I've given you a rebuttal with statistics and commentary. What do you do? You continue to crow the "study". "What about the study??" goes the lament. You're like Futurecurrents who continues to go on and on and on endlessly about the same bullshit "98% of peer reviewed" crap with no new content, no intelligent retorts to anyone. Just parroting. You and she need to get the same perch.
Regardless if where they come from, you have no plan to get rid of them. All you want to do is make it illegal for legal owners of firearms to possess them. The criminals will still keep in robbing, killing, etc. So until you can come up with a plan that doesn't result in law abiding citizens being left unprotected, you will never get anyone other than the loony left to side with you for a solution. That, my friend AK Forty Seven, is a fact.
So you’re basically asking me if there is something as perfect law enforcement practice that is appropriate for every situation and across all time. No. Laws need to be adjusted from time to time. NYC is in a pretty good era for a big city. There’s no need to keep the same practices from 30 years ago.
I haven't lost anything. I still have all my firearms, and you're still shrieking about how people like me are the problem, yet ignoring the inner city and gang issues that are actually causing the problems. As with all liberal narratives, you don't give a shit about solving the problem. All you care about is imposing your way upon the rest of us. I'm interested in solving the problem. What about you?
DiBlasio... he's sooooo full of himself, seems he thinks the sun sets in his ass! He's about as abrasive as taking an angle grinder to your hemorrhoids.
The same logic should apply to cocaine consumption. The stricter the law (harder to get) should = drive consumption/use to zero. Oh wait lol. Gang related gun deaths have a huge correlation with drugs/ turf wars. Ain’t no one killing for no reason unless you are a white bread inbred lol. It’s bad for business.