"Am I the only one who would like to read some of Jack Hershey's books?" this whole book nonsense was covered many months ago in several ET threads...the books are not about trading...they were about other areas jack has worked on...for ex: one was arcitecture i believe...you can find some of the books by googling (they were not easy to find, but if you looked hard enough you can locate them), they were more like textbooks and not available on amazon, but they are not about trading...so who cares.
way too much drama going on here. let everyone post what they want and just remove SPAM. if people don't like people, they can put them on ignore and/or not read the thread. FRuiTY
Your thinking is illogical to anyone who reasons out how to solveproblems. Tell me why you wrecked so much for me. Do you do it to satisfy some difficulty in your life? Why did you continually wreck things for me here?
Your comment about stochastic is correct, they can stay overbought for some time. On the other hand add a trend following indicator to stochastic as a filter will help solve that. I no traders who use only price action and volume along with patterns to make their decisions. This is fine, but since their are many traders and instutions who follow trend indicators, it is un wise to ignor them.
I did not know magna was the moderator of the Journals. He posted something about repatedly using inappropriate cirticisms of hard working people in the journal. I can't imagine why a moderator would put an OT post in a journal. I requested that some OT posts by killed. That cannot be done to keep the jourbnal focussed. At this point I will ask each person to withdraw their OT posts and hope someone in ET has the capability of satisfying their requests if they make them to ET in the proper manner. It will take several trials to find out what the SOP is and even if it is possible at all. I will spent time doing this for one reason. The reason is that I want the users of the journal to have a benefit. This benefit I want is labelled convenience and efficiency in their learning efforts which they make time for and activiely do. One of these OT people is magna the others are electric savant and oddiduro (2). four kill requests. Magana has 9 from me he syas. I made a mistake in the post at the top of page 3. It reads: Re:RE: tool box post ii page4 Money Making Process Then the text Naturally I have screwed up here; I put the money making process under Tool box by mistake. What do people do under these circumstances. Magna insists on leaving it there. and when my correction appears, he kills it. My correction reads: RE:Re: Money Making strategy post 11, page 4 Money Making Process. Then the correction. What idid as I kept working during the day etc was check out how it looked and print it twice and do the procedure I was recommending to others. It didn't work out because I could not get the mistake killed as I requested but what happened was that the correction got killed. There is a reason for these fucked up situations. Read what and how these moderators address the members. they have no fucking idea what they say means to others. There is no way I can get to a civil efficient whatever with magna. He can't read and understand. He actually thinks he is contributing by his comments and his actions. I asked him to refrain from posting in threads where he causes damage to others either unknowningly or because of his "lapses". There is no viable substantive content in his posts regarding making money. He comments only on people, where they are and characterizes what they are doing. I could type in uper case. something like.....Blah blah...and he will still not ask for direction from a person who might be able to get him to understand what being fair is. first off I am going to try to get some posters to give readers consideration by requesting that their posts be killed. second, I am going to go through whatever to find out how to implement that process and actually determine if it is possible for them although it is not possible for me so far.
dgabriel offers several points and I personally have no desire to offer any comments specifically on his orientation or place. As to who I am and what I am doing, let me offer my viewpoint. I am requesting help and support to improve any and all members understanding of the substantive content of the system I use, and suggest be fitted into their personal approaches. I do regard my remarks here as appropriate. It is difficult here, in my position, to offer effective support and keep up with the questions people have and the incietes they offer to others re the subject. Execellence and fairness is where I am coming from. To let everyone know, I do feel that I understand the guidelines. So far I have not been able to accept the destructive comments made by a few others. They piss me off most when they are directed at others and do cause direct and indirect harm. The comments and the way I am treated by people who hurt me are not easy to deal with for the direct reason that it makes me less effective. The unnecessary polls were permenantly destructive to me personally. I am trying to find out what made them necessary to the ET moderators. 70 year old people are different than others. Any where I go I have deep responsibilites. It is not because I take myself too seriously; it is because I have something to give. dgabriel thinks he has seen me this that or the other thing. he hasn't. what he may have glipsed is my intollerant for harm done to others. Done by people whom I have now given the opportunity to rethink and correct their orientation. dgabriel is going to find out about the other side of the 4 out of 5 coin. He comprehension skills so far stink and are glib and superficial as we all observe. If he can put two numbers together and get a close answer, fine. Because 4 out of 5 people thing my stuff is bullshit is not my problem it turns out. Mymodus is not yet in your consciousness but yopu are getting some vibes that are beginning to wake you up. You are not going to read any of my books. They are all about solving pervasive national problems, etc. You have no reason that is positive to read them. You are going through a transition that I am conducting for you. The first thing you are processing is getting the rules straight and the second is getting an understanding of who is important here. As you recite the rules you are getting your first success taken care of. when your second lesson surfaces, you can reflect on it as well. Regarding the rules, you probaly notice that the people following them are people here to learn and perople who support that learning. You made a very bad guess at thinking I was regarding myself as a person who needed whatever re rules. The point I made was for you to get off your ass and kill some posts that were attacks on learners and those supporting learners. you kill posts that reflect on you thus far. I am supporting learning and I am not in the claims business. you are reading what you see as claims. Get out od the claims reading business as soon as you can allow yourself. I welcome substantive criticism. When people have to be called assholes to get them to start taking lessons which straighten crap out, they get that opportunity as you can see. you will be posting alot here for the benefit of those you serve. finding that out is your second lesson. get the fawning acolytes bullsit out of your mind too. These people here collectively are trying to learn. what you don't have straight yet is this: peole who succeed personally with another persons help say thankyou. They are not in any way fawning. when people do better in harvesting money, it is even more important because money is a helpful thing in itself. specifically what you are seeing here and not understanding because you haven't finished the second lesson, is how people behave when "transference" is being affected. I am in fact, very limited here. I provide continuing support, information and substantive knowledge. In learning to make money,it is not possible to just read books. It takes work and it takes getting it right. nothing is "meaningless". these people here are adding meaning to things and they are manifesting knowledge their way in their good time with continuing effort. You fawn crap is the same as magna meaningless. That is why you get thye classification you do. You are going to learn to treat people here in a different way than you do. You can regard my comments to be on the topics you scoped out to set your record whatever. I have offered my viewpoints and the standards I have for stuff.
I am requsting to know the basis of your behavior. Let me know if you havbe any answers If you are not conscious of what you are doing just pass or make another inoccuous statement. I am asking you directly and immediately when you enter this turf why you did all that you did towards me in the past.
In total support of whay you say, here we use the absolute MACD and the relative STOC. a few months ago I was goint to shift the relativavistic one a little bit as time went by, but I now see that hanging in there with the 14, 1,3 will get fewr people in trouble near the front end of making money. I am oriented to slaloming which will soon become the modus for most. The post Labor day groove will be to have us knocking down profits for real daily.
Jack, I was trying to figure out sequences for market paces and the only ones i can think of are Fast pace(rocket) too no pace(ccc)and vice versa from no pace(ccc, more centering) to fast pace(rocket). What is the sequence when the market goes from or too slow or medium paces? Sometimes i think i may see a sequence of slow/medium(upward pennant) to fast rocket short but i am not sure. Can't wait till apres labor day grooving. jc