The Stochastic Indicator

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by jack hershey, Feb 17, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dawg

    dawg

    and what was his point?
     
    #581     Apr 4, 2003
  2. vinigar

    vinigar

    What I'm suggesting is that it's all in the price action. What I'm encouraging you to do is to "play the market", not to "play the indicator".

    Old Trader
     
    #582     Apr 4, 2003
  3. dawg

    dawg

    i couldn't find the post.
     
    #583     Apr 4, 2003
  4. dkm

    dkm

    3 trades so far today based on intrabar signals on 5 min chart:

    09:50 Long 881.75 exit 09:53 879.75 -2
    10:17 Short 874.50 exit 10:20 875.50 -1
    10:28 Short 873.50 exit 10:29 875.50 -2

    In the first case, both 14,1,3 stoch lines were above 80, macd histogram > 0.4 and macd >1.

    In the two short trades, both 14,1,3 stoch lines were below 20, macd histogram < -0.4 and macd < -1.

    From the attached chart, it is clear that these were all false signals as they no longer existed after each bar closed.

    The opportunity to wash out at zero loss didn't present itself. Any comments would be welcome.

    David
     
    #584     Apr 4, 2003
  5. svrz

    svrz

    DKM

    Perhaps it would be best if you used Quote.com's 'All sessions' charts. It looks like the opening gap is skewing the stochastic indicator.

    Hope this helps.
     
    #585     Apr 4, 2003
  6. colina

    colina

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    wash trades
    3 trades so far today based on intrabar signals on 5 min chart:

    09:50 Long 881.75 exit 09:53 879.75 -2
    10:17 Short 874.50 exit 10:20 875.50 -1
    10:28 Short 873.50 exit 10:29 875.50 -2

    In the first case, both 14,1,3 stoch lines were above 80, macd histogram > 0.4 and macd >1.

    In the two short trades, both 14,1,3 stoch lines were below 20, macd histogram < -0.4 and macd < -1.

    From the attached chart, it is clear that these were all false signals as they no longer existed after each bar closed.

    The opportunity to wash out at zero loss didn't present itself. Any comments would be welcome.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hello dkm,

    Very good post. And point well taken. If I use just the indicators “histogram” and “stoc” as my only set of signals and in a mechanical way, there are days when they work like clockwork. And there are days when I get burned.

    If I may put in my two cents here. This reply is not meant to be condescending as I’m sure what I post is obvious to you (Also I have benefited greatly from your postings and work elsewhere and look forward to learning with and from you in the future).

    What helps me is to view the whole terrain. Which means expanding my indicator set. But isn’t that what this approach is all about? (1st level stoc/histogram, 2nd level points/trends/channels, 3rd level 1 min vol dus, b.o.(p,m,v), etc etc etc) Yesterday closed down as a rocket. Today opened gap up. That gives me consideration to pause. Better be a strong bounce to continue? Sync occurred early 9:35am (or at least cash/futs moving in tandem). 1st attempt to close gap (60%) at 9:40am. At 9:50 sectors of market map checkered. While tech and industrial in the red others such as financial, energy, utilities are in the green or neutral. The large histogram values at the opening were due to the gap. Looking at the continuing histogram values forces me to take a look at the 1 minute chart. I see only one nice trend price bar with volume at 9:43. A potential pt#1 setup on the 1 minute. A failure for pt#3 at 9:47 and 9:50, of which have no obvious enhancing trend volume. Simultaneously NQ has a very crude fbp developing. The 1 minute macd is at a xovr point.

    At 10:17 a lot has just happened. The 5 minute chart has a mini tape developing for the last 5 bars . We have closed the gap and are hitting support at ~ yesterdays’ close. On the 1 minute at 10:17 I’m hitting my rt line of which I have been in the channel drawn since 9:50. We have closed the gap and are hitting critical support at ~ yesterdays’ close. Is this a bit late to consider entering a position? (hitting rt line on 1 min, almost closed gap, support line coming up) That gives me consideration to pause. Even though my indicators are just starting to turn on with stoc and histogram here. Oddly enough at this point the 1 minute macd has only been entwining while the 5 min macd has been diverging.

    At 10:28 a lot is going on. I’ve broken out of the rt line drawn on 1 minute chart, retraced, then retesting the support level of the previous channels’ trough. Volume does increase as I break this support level only to bounce off of yesterdays’ close which was the loy. A nice mini ftp follows. Again, a little late for entry even though my stoc and histogram are turning on?


    The short answer is using only two indicators in a mechanical approach does not always work for me. And if I do use only these two then I look for signs of a strong trend. (At the very least this translates to not having a hair trigger as soon as indicator goes on) Maybe today was a day for slaloming which is well beyond me. There are nuances I am trying to learn which I have not grasped yet and may never (lol).

    It is easy to comment on things in hindsight and nobody hates a Monday morning football quarterback more than myself. I don’t have the insight I wish I did in the heat of the moment. I still can’t and don’t trade live. Definitely not! And I have my own (deeply rooted) psychological barriers to overcome. Yet it is such a pleasure to go down this road, where it will lead is a total mystery to me.
     
    #586     Apr 4, 2003
  7. colina

    colina

    Please note also: entering a short position at 10:17, the opportunity to wash did present itself after the retrace. Something easier said than done. Balls of steel helps :)
     
    #587     Apr 4, 2003
  8. vorzo

    vorzo

    Hardly, I think it depends on the risk tolerance level and what one thinks the mkt will do next. If they think it will reverse, they will see all the signs in favor of reversal and ignore the ones that tell them it's only a correction, and viceversa. It's in the eye of the beholder.


    FWIW, here are my trades for Thu since I have the annotated chart saved. Last night I had to do something for work which took me till after midnight so today I couldn't get up to trade. Bringing work home sucks :mad:... unless you're trading.

    Classic example of NOT sitting on your hands when you oughtta. Fortunately I didn't hurt myself too bad [on paper].

    #1 rocket signal and volume spike on bar down on 1 min
    Short 9:59 877.50
    Cover 10:03 877.75 rocket failed and reverse.
    -0.25

    #2 reversal - failed rocket, 5m MACD converging
    Long 10:03 877.75
    Sell 10:09 877.75 washed it as I was unsure of the signals.
    0.00

    #3 inside bar rocket signal (fast line above 80, MACD >+0.4 diverging nicely). Didn't see up volume declining on 5m before entry.
    Long 10:46 880.50
    Sell 10:53 879.00 no rocket, channel broken. Slow execution.
    -1.50

    #4 reversal - failed rocket, 5m MACD crossing down, 1 min already xed.
    Short 10:54 878.75
    Cover 11:03 879.50 washed it. 5m MACD entwined at 0, recognized convergence - ftp forming.
    -0.25

    #5 VDU breakdown, entry below low of 11:15 inside VDU bar
    Short 11:21 879.00
    Cover 11:23 879.00 washed it as volume failed to rise above 5k.
    0.00

    #6 rocket signal 5 min later, this time breakdown was for real
    Short 11:29 878.00
    Cover 11:55 877.00 5m MACD x up -> fast line out -> channel broken.
    +1.00

    Day -1.00 (6 trades comm -1 pt.)
    Was looking too much at 1 min chart and missed the big picture = consolidation day, lots of chop. Also moving ahead too soon.

    Week +15.00 (13 trades comm -2.50 pt)
    Net +12.50
     
    #588     Apr 5, 2003
  9. dkm

    dkm

    Colin, svrz,
    thanks for your comments. This illustrates nicely the additional risk involved when taking signals before the close of each bar. I think I'll return to my earlier preference of waiting for the bar to close. Maybe it will help the washing... :)

    David
     
    #589     Apr 5, 2003
  10. pretzel

    pretzel


    How about just following the WL script signals? ( That would be less stressful than having to "think" what the mkt will do next.)

    pretzel
     
    #590     Apr 5, 2003
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.