That's the funny thing. I've never seen Jack make a post saying I traded the "method" today, and here are my trades and results. I really have to wonder whether he even trades this method day-to-day.
...and if he doesn't? What does that prove? It seems that you, and any number of others have very little to do with your time. Perchance you wold be kind enough to post your results, so that we might see your credibility in questioning Jack. May we expect to see your statements?
You, of course. The idea that one can't quetion somebody else without providing a statement of his own results is a little bizarre. --Db
A demand for seeing results from someone who isn't selling anything is bizarre. And with that, I will conclude this matter.
Truly, Tampa, if anything Jack has written has helped you, I say great thats what ET is all about. But, I do still have a problem with Jack making unsubstantiated, and I contend improbable, performance claims. I think it hurts his credibility and takes away from whatever worthy information he may be conveying. Further, it appears to me you are not using Jack's methodologies as written. As an example, you posted the following trade for 3/14: Using the 5-2-3 stochastic, and the +1 or â1 MACD signal. 12:17 Short @832.00 12:50 xxxxx @827.75 I pulled up a 5 min. chart using 5-2-3 stochastic, and at 12:15 the slow line was well above 20 or 25. So, to me it didn't look to be a Hershey short. Perhaps I have it all wrong. It won't be the first time. Nevertheless, you appear to be adding your own feel in terms of entry and exit. Again, if that works for you great.
And anyone with an interest in international subway tickets will want to see that nice specimen from Singapore.