the sooner we get away from BEEF

Don't take me out of context please

"without injury to health discernible by their models.."

 

regardless, their models suggest, without injury to health, one can eat some meat. This suggests, heck it states, that eating some meat is ok. A logical conclusion to draw is that eating some meat, in accordance with their model, does not cause any injury to health.

This refutes the entire premise of this thread.

 

"one can eat some meat" and get away with it? is this your argument??

why do you want to get away with something rather than eat healthy

 

I'm just going off of the models findings, if NO HARM is done to the body then there is no need to give anything up. Very simple, not rocket surgery



No harm = not unhealthy

 

no harm DISCERNIBLE by THIS model.

what about cumulative harm that's below THEIR radar

 

Hey Fireplace,

Does Volume come with that ?>'

:eek:

 

I've turned off my PM for now, because the Jack Hershey nut sniffer guy was flooding me with emails because I made one single comment about a Jack Hershey poll being skewed. The guy is whacked out of his skull!

 

does anyone have any evidence as to why we should eat lots of meat?

 

we have evidence (provided by you) which says that eating some meats does the body no harm. So giving it up completely is not necessary at all.

 

Going under the assumption that giving up completely is not necessary, is any REQUIRED?