The S&P looks very toppy

Discussion in 'Politics' started by James Stock, Jan 12, 2004.

  1. Hey!!! Who' you calling waggie???:confused: Sheeeesh, I actually kinda liked your calls as Romeo, but you had to spoil it:p Fun thread:D good calls:cool: Audit trail needs work tho....:)
     
    #151     Jan 13, 2004
  2. LOL! Sorry spec. I hate conflict.
     
    #152     Jan 13, 2004
  3. Inandlong, how dare you polute this thread with reason and insightful analysis. The nerve!
     
    #153     Jan 13, 2004
  4. balda

    balda

    You are not the only one who called the top
    But you DID call the top, my hat is off to you.
     
    #154     Jan 13, 2004
  5. or whatever the Hell your latest "alias of the month" is:

    Riskarb flat out "bitch-slapped" you from here to Mars!

    He produced his current positions of Short S&P 1100 Puts vs Short 65 March ES Futures via a SCREENSHOT for all of ET to see and you produced absolutely NOTHING!

    In fact, you ran away like the Little Boy Blue that we all know that you are . . .

    GET REAL MORON, OR GET OFF ET!

    :eek:
     
    #155     Jan 13, 2004
  6. pspr

    pspr

    Hey, we only finished down 7 on the ES. I don't think that qualifies as a top. Not just yet anyway. Only MORE time will tell.

     
    #156     Jan 13, 2004
  7. Just because the S&P dropped 7 handles today, and is down a whole 9 handles from the contract high doesn't mean that the market has actually, and necessarily topped.

    You are worse than a broken clock, man.

    GET REAL, NO ONE HERE BELIEVES ANYTHING THAT YOU SAY, ESPECIALLY AFTER TODAY, and the way that RISKARB HAMMERED YOU INTO OBLIVION!

    :D
     
    #157     Jan 13, 2004
  8. pspr

    pspr

    You're too late, Waggie. I think James picked up his marbles and when home.

     
    #158     Jan 13, 2004
  9. balda

    balda

    absolutely agree
    as of now he was correct on a first half of today's daily trend.
     
    #159     Jan 13, 2004
  10. pspr

    pspr

    BTW, we just hit a 4 day stretch yesterday that historically falls into a category which has returned an anualized return of 51% per annum (long) since 1989.

     
    #160     Jan 13, 2004