The Republicans are at it again...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by chuck.ells, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. What Clinton, Frank, Studds, & Kennedy did was not hypocritical? Elected officials are not expected to act in a certain dignified and moral way?

    I have condemned pedophiles on numerous threads here, and if you would bother to do a search you would see that my venom makes no distinction between those who have occupation A v.s. occupation B.

    Answered above and elsewhere.

    You give us a straight answer: Do you or do you not condemn the actions of Frank, Studds, Kennedy, and Clinton?

    Inspector Clouseau running in circles....
     
    #31     Sep 20, 2007
  2. Typical right wing tactics of bringing up other people's sins as a defense against criticism of the Republican party.

    I do not condemn Frank, Studds, Kennedy and Clinton, because they did not advocate a policy of intolerance, opposing something in the public while doing it themselves. The elected officials are not my role models. As long as they do what they promise in the election, I can care less what they do in their private lives. Unlike you, I do not equate stupidity with hypocrisy.

    Again you are making the claim that you condemned Foley, but in fact you are not in this post, nor have you done it in any previous post. In fact, you are defending Foley by bringing up all the Democratic sinners in the past. Will this make the Republican party look less hypocritical?
     
    #32     Sep 20, 2007
  3. Ok, so do you condemn them cuz what they did is against the law?

    Or should we be "tolerant" of Democrat politicans fixing tickets, pedophilia, drunkdriving/manslaughter, and lying to a grand jury? All because they "tolerant" of alternative lifestyles/ideals?
     
    #33     Sep 20, 2007
  4. Everyone should just back off hapadouche for a second. It's obvious he's quite enraged and his BP is through the roof and is possibly about to burst a testicle and stroke out right in front of his screen. And then is wife finds all of that kiddy porn on his hard drive....and...and ..oh my...it's just gets ugly.
     
    #34     Sep 20, 2007
  5. "Anyone regardless of political affinity should get whats coming to them under the law."

    That's not a condemnation, BTW.

    Hapaboy so far has failed to refute the accusation that he has not condemned any of the Republican sinners, yet is quick to attack anyone who dares to mock these hypocrits. Makes one wonder why...
     
    #35     Sep 20, 2007
  6. i was asking for YOUR opinion.

    And trying to justify your not answering a direct q by quoting Hap's respones to you is doing EXACTLY what you want to condemn Hap for. Isn't that hypocrisy?

    And since you use the word "hypocrisy" as a dirty word when condemning others - how do you feel when it is applied to you?
     
    #36     Sep 20, 2007
  7. Typical moonbat smokescreen when they're knee-deep in shit of their own making.

    You won't condemn Clinton even though he committed perjury, because he never said, "I will not commit perjury"?

    You won't condemn Franks for fixing tickets and his apartment being used as home base for a prostitution ring involving his boyfriend because he never said, "I will never fix tickets or let my apartment be used for any criminal enterprise"?

    You won't condemn Kennedy for leaving the scene of a fatal accident because he never said, "I promise never to drive drunk and leave the scene of a fatal accident"?

    You won't condemn Studds for having sex with an underage page because prior to having sex with the page he never announced publicly that he wouldn't?

    Answer these questions, nimrod.

    So if the next President lives up to political promises made during the campaign to your satisfaction, but one day is found with a dead underage teen in their bed, you won't have any problem with that because hey, they never said they wouldn't kill a kid during their campaign?

    Do you realize what an ass you sound like? I doubt it...

    My posting and thread record here makes clear how I feel about pedophiles. I will not give you the satisfaction of me doing the work for you. You're one of the lazier moonbat schmucks I've ever had the displeasure of meeting, you know that?

    As usual your correlations are way off base.

    Good grief, I hope to God you really are not a "professor" and in charge of "educating" some of our country's youth. Not only are you an utter moonbat, but you're also lazy and incapable of even slightly complicated thought. I'd wager most of your students are much brighter than you will ever be.
     
    #37     Sep 20, 2007
  8. I see Kato has come to the defense of Inspector Clouseau...

    And the intelligence quotient on this thread immediately drops.
     
    #38     Sep 20, 2007
  9. LOL...that's pretty funny. I have to watch those movies again. One of my all time favorites with Peter Sellers is "Being There."

    Goes easy hapa....don't burst a blood vessel...it's not worth it. Plus you win nothing.



     
    #39     Sep 20, 2007
  10. I'm glad you can see your mental equivalent reflected in the mentally deficient characters of Peter Sellers.

    And believe me, I'm not even busting a sweat making JB3 my bitch. He's even easier than you are on your best day. :D :D
     
    #40     Sep 20, 2007