I will be happy to answer your question after you have answered mine. Why 10 years old? What about 11, 12, 13, 14, etc. and how do you determine the appropriate age?
LOL you are so right. In US there are these rare psychos whom the law gives hell. In Arab land it is the Chief Cleric who preaches religion and brotherhood. Yeah I understand the great 'culture' in Arab land.
Right on time! Please note, the Idiotic pedophile-lover is changing his posts as time goes by. He is no longer asking 'why not 8 years old, why not 7 years old'. He has realized (as a moral bankrupt, this wasn't intuitively evident to him) that asking 'how do you determine, what are your criteria for determining that 7 is too young for a 45-year old man to anally rape a child' is basically enough to lock him up. Of all the toy weapons in the Idiot Troll's arsenal, absurd hypotheticals like the ones he's floating in this thread are perhaps the most telling. They speak to a level of intellectual pathology that I had only heard about or read about in books. Thank you, Troll, for showing me what the right hates most about the extreme idiot left, as exemplified by you.
Having trouble recognizing yourself? THIS is me: <img src=http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc182/SuperSaiyanBowser2/Motivational%20Posters/MotivationalChaoticNeutral.jpg>
Didn't take long for you to make it about you...narcissism at work and all that. Might steal your car, might go to jail for drug abuse, might go to jail for violating probation...
I might indeed... but at least I freely admit what I am: Good, bad or Chaotic-Neutral. You could learn much from this mentality; There's really nothing more pathetic than a Lawful-Evil troll and his two inches of meat prancing around like he's John Holmes in a Lawful-Good cape. Lawful-Evil: It's not just for Nazis, tyrants & mob bosses anymore!
A person in denial is not generally capable of admitting what they actually are... A common personality character of a drug addict who has not really gone into recovery, but has found another "drug" of choice...bupe bupe eeee doop. Self denial, if you will...so they are "honest" to the degree they are genuinely honest with themselves...which means that even though they are speaking frankly about themselves, it is nothing but a lie given what is lying beneath the surface that is the subject of the inner denial.
I have refuted you Z, but I can't help it that you are not bright enough to notice. You can't even follow a simple argument to its conclusion, you think spewing more volume of garbage out constitutes an argument... I was still commenting on your original statement... ...by saying that it is our business to pass judgment on other cultures because sub cultures are still cultures no matter how many adhere to it, your position is a logical non answer by re-iterating a thousand times the vacuous and obvious assertion that sub cultures can break laws. A subculture is a culture, period. The KKK is a subculture, and therefore a culture. Breaking laws is irrelevent and laws themselves can be immoral, we pass judgment on the KKK and we should regardless of whether they break laws. Hey, congratulations on contradicting yourself within a few lines of the same post, that's quite a dazzling display of sophistry: Now if you can't understand the logical contradiction there within your words, then I'm sorry but you are beyond help. You are trapped in an ignorant vortex of absolute belief in your world view without a rigorous assesment of it. yup, that's what people do. Having sex with ten year olds is what cavemen did, therefore I deem that practice less evolved. Medically and psychologically it is a bad idea to marry and have sex with ten year olds. I also notice you have no effective response to my point that at one time slavery was a lawful practice, and according to you then judgement should not have been passed.