Okay, you say a 10 year old is sick. What about 11? What about 12? What about 13? What about 14? What about 15? What about 16? What determines the appropriate age? Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed?
Thanks Mom0. It's always a pleasure to engage in debate with real thinkers. It doesn't matter whether we agree or not. What we do with the ZTroll is more like what a cat does with a mouse. No one should wait around for a direct answer to my question from the Troll. It makes him uncomfortable, and he generally likes to change the subject when uncomfortable questions pop up.
Looks like I struck a nerve. Losers coming out of the woodwork clamoring about moral relativism and cultural differences. Obviously they'd be OK if moose-limbs had slaves and ate people for lunch since it's all part of their culture. Moose limbs have a long history of incestuous pedophilia, a big reason they have these supporters here. These dolts are mad they have to wait until the girl turns ten before they can rape them, but at least there is a culture to support their perverted ways. Oh how they dream of humping infants in the streets. Perhaps it helps to restore their "manhood" in some disgusting manner. Interesting to see all the lovers of kiddie porn out in the open supporting the moose limbs. Review the thread, see who is ready to rip open some diapers of their relations for some easy sexual gratification.
Whereas, relatives of a Muslim girl can murder and then brag about killing her for sexual improprieties, whether or not she was actually guilty of anything. Funny, in most other religions, sisters or daughters are loved and supported and defended by their family, not stoned in the name of God
TZ: What I wrote is just a fact. I am siding with no one. I can tell you my point of view on minimum age of marriage if you want to know. Why are you irritated when I pointed out the fact below to the readers---Are you ashamed of it?: "The minimum age for marriage under Jewish law is 13 for boys, 12 for girls;" I think you know by now that unlike others I am not a propagandist. I just write facts as they are. If you do not like it, do not hate me, hate the facts.
Why do you keep casting yourself as an innocent misunderstood? You reacted to someone's post with a "fact" So I reacted to your post with a "fact." Whereas, relatives of a Muslim girl can murder and then brag about killing her for sexual improprieties, whether or not she was actually guilty of anything. Funny, in most other religions, sisters or daughters are loved and supported and defended by their family, not stoned in the name of God You are not a propagandist, you are just severely deluded with Islam. You believe rather than research, and your "research" is amazingly simplistic. You confuse facts with "Islamic sites present very strained and pithy evidence and therefore RFT accepts it blindly and is amazed despite its Elementary School nature."
TZ: Cool down my friend. You are too emotional. Do what I did/do. I am interested in God and truth. I read all books. I have read the bible (not all the bible books though as some are annoying and clearly not from God but just chaps to have written a document on their understanding of God), I have read the Tanakh (particularly) the 5 books of Moses, and the Quran. I can tell you that the Quran is far superior to any of those books individually or in combination. That is my honest assessment. I also like the five books of Moses, particularly because Moses had the courage to write in black and white views such as Genesis. Now we can take that book of Moses, and test it using scientific facts (not theories) to see if it is true and also test it against previous copies of Moses books. I am applying the same standard to all sacred books. PS: Every man, women, and animals, love their children. They not only hurt them, but they defend them. If you think that some races and religions treat their children differently, you are either a propagandist or a brainwashed.