The reason why the democrats won't stop the Iraq war

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Nick Leeson Jr, Apr 2, 2007.

  1. The reason the democrats won't be stopping the Iraq war anytime soon: they are making too much money on it . . . . - Government watchdog groups want more answers as to why Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) stepped down from a military appropriations subcommittee at a time questions were being asked billions of dollars in federal defense contracts going to her husband's companies.

    Feinstein resigned her post as chairwoman of the Senate Subcommittee on Military Construction Appropriations last week.

    The decision came less than two months after Metro Newspapers, a group of alternative weekly papers in northern California, detailed the number of defense contracts awarded to Perini Corp. and URS Corp., both of which her husband, Richard C. Blum, has ownership, according to the newspapers.

    The investigation was partially funded by the Investigative Fund of The Nation Institute, a non-profit organization affiliated with the liberal magazine The Nation.

    "This was a critique from the left," Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest group, told Cybercast News Service. "These were left-leaning papers. The fact that she stepped down from the committee lends credibility to the charges."

    Fitton said this is something Judicial Watch wanted to further investigate, possibly by seeking public documents on the matter and by asking the Senate Ethics Committee to look into the matter for a possible conflict of interest on Feinstein's part.

    "On the face of it, it seems she at least had influence on how contracts were awarded," Fitton said. "There should be an investigation."

    Feinstein's press office was contacted several times Friday by Cybercast News Service, but her office did not provide a statement on the matter at the end of the day.

    The California weeklies detailed examples that included a subcommittee hearing in which Feinstein asked Pentagon officials about increasing anti-terrorism protection for Army bases.

    The next year, in March 2003, Feinstein asked why the funds for anti-terror protection had not been spent. Just over a month later, URS announced a $600 million contract to provide services for U.S. Army bases that included anti-terrorism force protection.

    In another instance, Feinstein asked another military official when money would be spent on a maintenance facility for the C-17 Hickam Air Base in Hawaii. URS later announced a $42 million contract to build it.

    Also, Feinstein's subcommittee in mid-2005 approved funds to reinforce roofs at military stations in Iraq, and in October of that year, Perini got a $185 million federal contract for that purpose, the papers reported.

    The matter should be probed further, said Kenneth Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative government watchdog group. However, he isn't that confident in the Senate's ability to police itself.

    "The real problem is there is too little objectivity," Boehm told Cybercast News Service. "Congress needs an independent watchdog. The ethics committees are partisan. They have an equal number of Republicans and Democrats, but the reality is that things don't get looked at that should get looked at."

    Meanwhile, Melanie Sloan, executive director of the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, reportedly said the Feinstein matter could eclipse other congressional scandals.

    "There are a number of members of Congress with conflicts of interest," Sloan told Metro Newspapers. "But because of the amount of money involved, Feinstein's conflict of interest is an order of magnitude greater than those conflicts."

    The paper proudly reported Feinstein's exit from the Senate panel on its website last week, as reporter Peter Byrne stressed that Feinstein's subcommittee had jurisdiction over medical treatment for veterans long before the poor conditions were exposed at the Walter Reed Army Hospital.

    "You would think that, considering all the money Feinstein's family has pocketed by waging global warfare while ignoring the plight of wounded American soldiers, she would show a smidgeon of shame and resign from the entire Senate, not just a subcommittee," Byrne wrote.

    "Conversely, you'd think she might stick around [the subcommittee] to try to fix the medical-care disaster she helped engineer for the vets who were suckered into fighting her and [President] Bush's panoply of unjust wars," Byrne added.
  2. Why didn't the repugniklans stop the Iraq war when they were in power? :confused:
  3. It's post's like this that make people think you're an idiot.

    The Republican's didn't campaign in 2006 as the "peace" party. The Democrat's did.

    Republican's believe in engaging today's non-nuclear expansionist Islam in the Middle East rather than defending ourselves from tomorrow's atomic Islam here in the West.

    Democrat's believe if we hide our hands in the sand, build a fence on the Mexican border and hire unionized minority airport screeners that terror will be eliminated.

    And you didn't think Dem's were progressive.......

    As far as the other wing in the Democrat Party: Does anyone think Senator's named Feinstein or Lieberman aren't going to be hawks on behalf of Israel?

    Not to sound like Publisher but an ironic note is that 12% of the U.S. Senate is Jewish. Pretty wild considering they're 2% of the population. America is somewhere around 15-18% black and African-Americans number uno (Obama) in the Senate.

    26 Jews serve in the House and only one is a Republican. How shocking then that right-wingers like me think Jewish Democrat's are duplicitous socialist pricks. They criticize Bush under the pretense of being against the war but that's a sham. In fact they hate Bush because of his domestic policies while favoring a U.S. military policy that vigorously defends Israel.

    If a true anti-war liberal is looking to the Democrat Party for a solution to Mid East peace then they're whistling Dixie......
  4. And yet former CIA Director James Woolsey believes that driving a Prius will get rid of Osama bin Laden. ( see latest issue of Car & Driver).

  5. pabst

    please stop posting... your senility is showing up again. Did you take your geritrol today?

  6. The excoriating vitriol of tradermaji . . .
  7. maxpi


    Hey, hey, the 100 days of the democrats are over and we still have the "culture of corruption". I thought they were big time activists and going to get rid of it.