Indeed. I am hooked. Especially because the responses can be quite bizarre sometimes. It's just so intriguing how that happens. When you think about it, the essence of it would make for great story tension and drama in a fictional work. Rarely do you see characters with the sort of motivation that makes them do and say things so illogical to support their point of view. It's pretty awesome really. You would make a legendary character in a story. And I mean that sincerely. If an author could capture your essence, the character he/she creates based on you would be talked about and studied for eons.
"Indeed. I am hooked." Indeed, you are. My suggestion is that you read RM's drug induced imaginative fantasy treatise on trolls...my guess is that is the only way you are going to be able to deal with the constant losing...blame the losses on the game. It took RM two weeks in ET free isolation to come up with that rationalization when he couldn't beat the game...so think of the time you will save! Really, it is the only way you can possibly save face...blame the game for your losing. Now bark like a dog, Druzhok*...bark like a dog... *http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_pavlov's_dog_name
All you are doing now is making sham arguments on my behalf to refute them in order to convince yourself of something else. Relying on one false statement after another, from probabilities through evolution, does not make you right. Same with Jem Itâs all heâs ever done. Pretending or deluding himself others are saying things they do not say. And OptionalZzz , only the Troll is both devious and infantile...essentially same thing though. You have no argument based on any facts. Science does. Itâs reason why no one has to just believe in stuff, especially superstitious faith. Still, fooling yourself is what religion's all about
I amend my comments to state: "some Evolutionists are apparently as IRRATIONAL as Creationists". For you to argue "Science" is absolute is hilarious at best. Science is ever evolving. Which means your absolute worldview is more in line with those you argue against. i.e. irrational. Another amusing, even illogical without any foundation, is your argument that probability theory has no place in evoutionary processes. May I suggest you begin with this: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001088/ Interpretations of Probability in Evolutionary Theory A reasonable inquisitive mind has more questions than answers. You, on the other hand, appear to have all the answers. Just like your Creationist mates. Carry on. I'm done with this topic.
There you go again. Making up arguments for me which I have not made myself. I've never said "Science" is absolute. I've never said either that probability theory has no place in the evolutionary processes. So why are you flapping around like this? Youâre fabricating silly statements on my behalf just so you can knock them down. Does that make you feel like your groundless assertions must therfore be right? Monkeys typing Shakespeare is not anything like any probability theory that is analogous to Evolution. Posting Website links to Philosophical ideas about probability and Evolution is not Evolutionary science. It's not even science. I still suggest you get some education on the subject before shooting off more of those really very silly remarks about it. Oh youâre done. Just as well. You were getting nowhere.
so much anti-science and lack of understanding on this thread that it's scary, stu. no wonder the world is so fukked up with all these fairy godmother believers :eek:
Yeah, well, when science is presented supporting social policy we don't like, then science aint so grand, is it?