And your point? That thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth are all retarded and gullible and that there is actually no issue with our environment and we should all read Piezoe's 5 line rebuttal to get schooled on HIS "facts"? Are some environmentalist diehards overstating facts? They certainly are. But climate change deniers are the much more ignorant breed for sure.
I don't subscribe to the person depicted in this term. So, to get this straight, the Chinese are taking the moral high ground now? The same people who just got out of the communist prison 20 years ago suddenly know how to live life right? Funny to say the least. The same bitchy new generation Chinese who bow to everything baba Xi tells them to do and blows his dick whenever he wishes. Identitity politics is only pushed by intellectually challenged people.
accurate description... however the real purpose is always the votes. The left has really no agenda to stand on, so they push policies to gain votes from the illegals, felons, LGBTs, trying to lower voting ages etc.
My view re "climate change" is virtually the same as Nir Shaviv's. It has nothing to do with attempting to characterize "thousands of the most intelligent scientists on earth ." I have repeatedly pointed out that scientific questions cannot be answered via opinion polls...
Should I be surprised? Climate change denier who rather builds his entire "house" on a "solar and cosmic-ray hypothesis". Of course, you characterize thousands of accomplished, respected, and peer-reviewed climate scientists who clearly outline a relationship between man-made CO2 emissions and climate change. Its as if you say "Hitler did not kill any Jews, but I do not characterize an entire generation of surviving Jews as liars"
I'm confused (admittedly not familiar with atmosphere norms etc), if human co2 is only 2% and 2 inches thick, the whole co2 is only 100 inches thick? Also is 2% too small and not significant enough to alter the delicate balance that adds up year after year? I'm genuinely curious.
Hard to get any honest answers from climate change deniers. Better to independently educate yourself. the 2% or 2 inches is total BS and was read by the poster on some funny website. If 2% or 2 inches were mentioned anywhere then he took it completely out of context just so that 5000 meters or feet sound exorbitantly large in comparison to 2 inches.