It would make a difference in my opinion on his senility if he crushed Trump in every debate. It would take something more than that to change my opinion that he is a tool of the very far left in his party, and that's a problem.
You are falling hook line and sinker for Trump's strategy like a simpleton. Well done. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/19/trump-2020-joe-biden-extreme-left
Fucking drunks. You are all just worthless trash bottle or not, the weak mind is always there. We all ignore that Trump's grandfather and older brother were alcoholics, the latter drank himself to death. The former was on his way but the Spanish flu got him. So Trump does not drink because he would fall into the same ditch. Problem is, the endorphin addiction mind is still there. So drunk on alcohol providing endorphins or the same chemical reward from "winning" and cruelty, its still the same compulsive thing that damages the lives of people around them.
I was getting ready to dismiss you as low IQ troll when I noticed the number of posts you have. I went through some of your posts and profile page and found out you have been posting under this handle for 9 years on ET, have 60 followers, and actively post on trading related subjects. You appear to have financial industry related experience. Very impressive. However, when it come to politics, specifically presenting ideas, you are not so impressive. Perhaps you get so emotionally wound up on an issue that you can not think straight. I am always happy to discuss the issues with anyone who is ready to have an intelligent conversation. Hopefully you’ll take a few deep breaths and relax before engaging me again. Personally, I’m more interested in understanding an issue rather than trying to fit the issue into my view of the way the world should be.
actually it’s you who didn’t understand the thread. go back and see the chain. Someone made a blanket accusation that liberals have no problems attacking children because they don’t like the adult. This post was made because a liberal on here made a joke in response to a conservative who posted a meme about Baron. I offered three examples of conservative policies actually aimed at attacking children. you then attacked me on the validity of those policies. Whether you agree with the family separation or not, there is no doubt it was designed to attack the children of potential illegal immigrants (to act as a deterrent). DACA is obviously designed to attack children who likely had no say where they live. I don’t see my response as emotional; I saw yours as such. You saw the word “DACA” and got triggered without seeing the context. so the intelligent discussion is the ad hominem attack in the early part of this thread. Wanna comment on that? Edit: I’m posting the initial attack so you don’t have to search for it. the attacker had no interest in responding. He’s likely one of those low IQ trolls.