So, you are willing to admit that Obama has used at least one fraudulent Social Security Number and possibly more? All I can say," says Daniels of 042-68-4425, "is that it's phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980." Read more: Another look at Obama's Social Security number http://www.wnd.com/index.php/index.php?pageId=275861#ixzz1IIXQINK0
mes.com/index.php/archives/2010/05/17/fact-check-neil-sankey-barack-obama-27-numbers/ "Exhibit 3 is an affidavit from a licensed investigator and retired Scotland Yard elite anti organized crime officer Mr. Neil Sankey, who has compiled from the most reputable National databases: Lexis Nexis and Choice Point a list of multiple addresses under the names of Barack Obama and Barry Obama, those addresses are connected to 39 different social security numbers, none of which were issued in the state of HI. Inaccuracy in the Lexis Nexis database is enough of an issue that it maintains a special link for people who are interested in correcting false information about themselves. And then thereâs Choice Point. What do we know about the Choice Point database service? At Privacy Internationalâs Big Brother Award ceremony held in Cambridge, MA on March 7, 2001, ChoicePoint received the âGreatest Corporate Invaderâ award âfor massive selling of records, accurate and inaccurate, to cops, direct marketers and election officials.â⦠EPIC argued that companies like ChoicePoint are returning people to a pre-Fair Credit Reporting Act era, one marked by âunaccountable data companies that reported inaccurate, falsified, and irrelevant information on Americansâ¦â these public records reports sold by Choicepoint have been shown to be highly inaccurate. According to a report by Pam Dixon of the World Privacy Forum, Choicepointâs public information reports have a very high error rate. In her sample, 90% of the reports obtained contained errors; frequently these errors were serious, such as individuals being identified by the wrong sexâ¦. Elizabeth Rosen, a victim of the Choicepoint privacy breach, found that five of the six pages of her report contained errors. Rosenâs report erroneously indicated that she was the officer of businesses in Texas, that she maintained a private mail box at âMailboxes Etc.,â and that she owned businesses, including a âZachâs Cheese and Deli.â Privacy researcher Richard Smith obtained his Choicepoint report and wrote that his report âcontain[ed] more misinformation than correct information.â That bit about identifying people by the wrong sex is directly verifiable in Neil Sankeyâs low-quality list, which begins by listing Stanley Ann Dunhamâs sex as âmaleâ 10 times and as âfemaleâ 0 times. Stanley Ann Dunham is the name of Barack Obamaâs mother. Was Barack Obamaâs mother a man? Now that would be a really explosive revelation! Other clear errors find their way into Sankeyâs list â the frequent misspelling of Barack Obamaâs name is one and the placement of the White House in the states of Maryland and California is another. My favorite is the record which places Barack Obamaâs residence at 1234 Happy Street, a street in Covington Washington that does not exist. Finally, what does Neil Sankey think of his own list? The Guardian asked him: Most recently, he carried out an exhaustive search of databases that he claims threw up 140 different identification numbers and addresses for âBarack Obamaâ. He admits the findings prove nothing â there is nothing to link the entries to the president⦠Letâs sum up: an error-riddled search with repeated false genders, multiple false names, dozens of false street addresses, and a few false states for something as easily located as the White House, generated from databases that at times contain more inaccurate information than accurate information, somehow generates multiple social security numbers for Barack Obama. Meanwhile, the search is rejected as proving nothing by the very person who carried it out. There are two conclusions you can draw from this: 1. This sure is one screwed up list. 2. Clearly, Stanley Ann Dunham was a man and Barack Obama does not actually exist. I go with Option 1." http://irregulartimes.com/index.php...ct-check-neil-sankey-barack-obama-27-numbers/
How long can Obama dance around the facts? <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/u9FX5O-Cqlc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, your video is from (PPSimmons) So I find this one from him too. He try to prove Obama is anti christ from Hebrew writing. :eek: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raCRSjnT0Wc
Barack, his aunt, Michelle, and now his uncle, have all been oppressed because of their use of false Social Security numbers. Unfair references have also been drawn, because these practices do not seem to have skipped a generation in the Obama family. http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1362374