The Pathology of the Conservative

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Feb 11, 2006.

  1. Awww, cmon - go ahead and try anyway!!
     
    #61     Feb 12, 2006
  2. Ah, now does this reach the level of flaming that the moderators begin to delete posts?

    Shall we find out?

     
    #62     Feb 12, 2006
  3. Waste of time, thanks anyway...

    But look at it this way, now you can go on and on and on and on and on.....how I refused your challenge.

    Bwaaaaahaaaahaaa.....


     
    #63     Feb 12, 2006
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    You love all the ways peeps give you to evade, don't you? Not that you need a way, you'd do it anyhow.
     
    #64     Feb 12, 2006
  5. You are going to live to regret this bit of weakness, Z. You are saying that your statements may or may not be indicative of your real opinions - you reserve the right to tell us after the fact whether or not what you said was what you really thought.

    This is the height of hypocrisy.
     
    #65     Feb 12, 2006
  6. You know what I love...

    Thanks Kreskin for the insight.....

     
    #66     Feb 12, 2006
  7. I am going to live to regret something I posted in Chit Chat?

    Oh man, that may be the dumbest and and at the same time the funniest thing I have ever read in Chit Chat....

    You really don't get it do you?

     
    #67     Feb 12, 2006
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    We get that you're a troll. Thanks for the grist. Too bad you get yourself pulled in. A good troll would not.
     
    #68     Feb 12, 2006
  9. Oh, you mean that posting at ET isn't very important to you? Is that why you have been banned and made your way back here?

    Does that explain this freakish statistic?

    Total Posts: 10215 (16.80 posts per day)

    btw... I know that when you use the word 'dumb', you aren't saying that I am dumb, you're just saying that I said something dumb. Right Z?

    I've never been banned, but I may get banned trying to out you :)
     
    #69     Feb 12, 2006
  10. ZZzzzzzzzzz, your comments on this thread are incredibly stupid.

    You have made stupid comment after stupid comment under your various aliases.

    Mind you, this doesn't necessarily mean that you are stupid.

    You have posted here on ET that you are divorced and wanted to kill your ex-wife, and you go to AA meetings. Bringing this up is not a flame, merely an observation.

    So it is possible that you are intelligent, and you make such stupid comments because you're a lonely and divorced alcoholic with violent urges and nothing better to do with his time except make stupid comments to agitate people on an internet chat board. But of course it is possible that you are not an intelligent lonely and divorced alcoholic with violent urges, but a stupid lonely and divorced alcoholic with violent urges.

    However, since you attend AA meetings, you do socialize to some extent, so you may not be lonely, although posting here with the frequency you do certainly gives the impression that you do not get out much. If you are not a lonely divorced alcoholic with violent urges who is intelligent or stupid, I apologize for the error. After all, we can only go by your public comments and actions.

    In your case, however, I think it is obvious. Only a very stupid person couldn't figure if your stupid comments came from a stupid divorced alcoholic with violent urges or an intelligent divorced alcoholic with violent urges who may or may not be lonely.

    Again, this is not a flame, but an observation based on statements you yourself have posted and utilize the same rationale you yourself employ. Any objective moderator will recognize that.

    You, however, have flamed on this thread:

    Asserting that tradernik has no reasoning skills and would die if he had to utilize them, is not based on statements he has made. He has not stated his profession and as such you cannot make any claim as to whether or not he employs reasoning to make a living.
     
    #70     Feb 12, 2006