The Origins of World War III

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by observer67, Dec 23, 2009.

  1. What if William Bourroughs was right?

    "This is a war universe. War all the time. That is its nature. There may be other universes based on all sorts of other principles, but ours seems to be based on war and games. "
     
    #51     Dec 29, 2009
  2. And the Iranians would say it began in 1953 when the Anglo-Americans overthrew Mossadegh, a democratically elected Prime Minister and installed a dictator - the Shah of Iran.

    If that never happened, I wonder what the middle east would look like today. Sure, we stopped Iran from nationalizing their oil for a couple decades... but ultimately, it is now over 80% of the world's oil that is nationalized and produced by sovereign entities.

    Blowback is a bitch.
     
    #52     Dec 29, 2009
  3. achilles28

    achilles28

    To the Elite, it certainly seems that way.

    War being their favorite tool in the Game of Domination.

    Governments killed over 200 Million, last century alone.

    It's really quite sick. Elites are sociopaths.

    They want us to think that we're the disease. That's where all this eugenics-inspired 'over-population' crap stems from. Trying to convince us to go along with a mass culling of species. When all along, its THEM who are the disease. They're the blight.

    Let Free Markets work, restore a stable currency with no income tax, and humanity would colonize the stars in 50 years.
     
    #53     Dec 29, 2009
  4. Dear achilles28,

    I agree with all you said except that power =! market...

    The market in general is exponential, it's only a mean of exchange of creativity... So there is no limit to it.
    For power it's a complete illusion... there is always a bigger fish in the sea :) and as the universe is big...

    By killing the fig trees no more figs for them too...

    the question that you raised is what is this percieved finish line ? absurd in a limitless universe :)

    About your point on Gorillas Alpha... if they were true alpha they wouldn't need to do this... By doing this they show their own weakness...

    Look, elephants don't do this...

    beautifull for sure !

    or are those "elites" already doing it ? And keeping it for themselfves ? I have the sentiment that by watching too much our screens we missed a lot of what was going on around...
     
    #54     Dec 29, 2009
  5. jorgez

    jorgez

    Yes, it does seem that way.
    Mankind has always been addicted to violence and this addiction has been the ruination of our planet and who knows, we may become so successful with our addiction that we ultimately destroy ourselves and thereby win the game.
     
    #55     Dec 29, 2009
  6. JSSPMK

    JSSPMK

    One society=no more wars. But that is just a utopia :)

    I wouldn't mind if there were no borders on this planet, one currency, one language, one religion, etc. in the end of the day we all share same origins.
     
    #56     Dec 29, 2009
  7. jorgez

    jorgez

    The purpose of a strong middle class is to manage the classes beneath them by edicts laid down by the class above them.

    A weak middle class allows the lower classes with nothing to lose to enter into direct conflict with the ruling class.

    The middle class is easily controlled, firstly by the granting of favors and then by the issuance of credit.

    Greed naturally killed this carefully balanced game when unrestricted credit was issued to the classes with nothing to lose and so "hello 2010"
     
    #57     Dec 29, 2009

  8. that's what the christian crusades were/are about

    there is nothing peaceful or harmonic about it

    in fact, it is good example of evilness and profound tyranny
     
    #58     Dec 29, 2009
  9. Please think before posting that nonsense. That's what the New World Order wants.

    Alas globilzation will give you what you desire.
     
    #59     Dec 29, 2009
  10. achilles28

    achilles28

    Anything is absurd when juxtaposed to a boundless universe.

    But that doesn't make it relevant, does it?

    Human reality is defined by other humans.

    Until that reality changes, we've got no other means to redefine our relative existence.
     
    #60     Dec 29, 2009