for all wannabees and most "traders" their method works only in their imagination so someone who is going to reverse engineer those methods will definitely fail - one can not reverse engineered the working method that does not exists
You are one of the posters I respect so I hate to disagree with you. Why is it stealing if you willingly publishes the results/methods and I use them to generate a trading recipe? As an example, you mentioned more than once that you often danced options around the underlying. It is an extremely valuable advise for those who understood what that meant. Did I steal from you when I implemented that approach? Anyway, IMHO it is easy to reverse engineer your trading principles/approaches but very difficult to reverse engineer your discretionary recipe because we don't have your brain. Best regards,
funny. Maybe Handle123 gave a too low number of observations to make a point, but he has a point nonetheless, but your observation is really good!
Useless information. You need the account size, the leverage, and the profits in $ to judge the performance. Maybe you made 4 winning trades, each 1$ net, on a 100K account...
About the reverse engineering using two points: short signals on QQQ: yesterday at 11:51 with QQQ at 173.26 (around 11:50AM) and today QQQ at 172.64 (at around 1:54PM). Reverse engineers this method.
Add to those points: short today's gap. I actually like this idea of trying to reverse engineering things as a way to see how good are a group of people at reverse engineering things.
ROFLMAO... it doesn’t matter anyway...institutions do the majority of trading..our little coca cola and potatoe chip money means diddly squat in the overall senario. They could care less about our reverse engineering...whatever..