The next refco?

Discussion in 'Retail Brokers' started by zf trader, Oct 13, 2005.

  1. Think about it.

    We know full well that no one can be trusted 100% and every transaction with an entity other than the Govt (and who knows, maybe that's not 100% either), has a risk of FRAUD and MALICE.

    The whole system is based on a certain TRUST that is built up over time. It is really not possible to function properly unless you accept certain risks.

    Now, the NYSE knows all this full well. The TAINT that a stock like RFX carries, is poisonous to the game of TRUST.

    Thus, they bury such carcasses with great haste.
     
    #51     Oct 18, 2005
  2. zdreg

    zdreg

    "every transaction with an entity other than the Govt (and who knows, maybe that's not 100% either), has a risk of FRAUD and MALICE."

    are you serious when you say maybe?
    :)
     
    #52     Oct 18, 2005
  3. nassau

    nassau

    interesting also is that persons or entities as mentioned above also got caught....
    this was not obvious as some of the posters state...
    Think about it, we are talking about hundreds of millions/billion? losses...not every one was stupid.....we are/were totally mislead intentionally ?...wilful blindness?...

    Even once the new started to come out and the stock was halted that was no reason to ever expect the stock to go from 30-1 in 2wks based upon the picture....
    20yrs plus old, quality underwritting, financials, worldwide corp.,
    need I go on..

    w
     
    #53     Oct 18, 2005
  4. nassau

    nassau

    as state above .....

    if it happened here.....

    it can happen anywhere.....anytime....

    we only know what we are told and or provided....

    we trade upon our perception of things being tangible.....

    w
     
    #54     Oct 18, 2005
  5. Anyone that says this was 'obvious' is full of carp. And the other thing too.

    Now Gretchen M. over at the New York Times did a piece on this Sunday, and as usual it was factually correct.

    Thing is, if you dig deep enough, every firm has something that would give you pause. If you raise your standards that high you would effectively be paralyzed.

    As for the gov't not paying off on a Bond, well, it's possible, the gov't may fail, there may be a revolution, or a Black Swan might take a dump on the White House lawn.
     
    #55     Oct 18, 2005
  6. zdreg

    zdreg

    the government always pay off with a by printing money resulting in a depreciating if not worthless currency and/or new currrency.
    i suspect that you live in the US or a western european country and don't think it is possible.
    look at history even from the period after world war 2.
     
    #56     Oct 19, 2005

  7. Do you know something that we all don't PTrecon??

    Care to be more specific :D :D :D

    Be careful however with what you say because their reaction is typically :eek: then :mad: and then the legal action. Censorship of the thread lurks somewhere inbetween of course.
     
    #57     Nov 2, 2005
  8. Please fill me in.
    I understand that historically failures of commodity brokers in the US, albeit few, have never made account holders lose money? Is this accurate?
     
    #58     Nov 2, 2005
  9. Oh no! Not the Banana Republic argument again....

    LOL....I love it.
     
    #59     Nov 2, 2005
  10. No, this is not accurate. Customers lost their segregated funds in a number of futures broker bankruptcies in the United States, sometimes due to trading losses by other customers, and sometimes due to embezzlement by the broker. The most recent futures broker bankruptcy, in which customers lost funds, occurred in 1989. See http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71701/sexton1.htm#P122_25856.
     
    #60     Nov 3, 2005