i dont know...u are either spreading propaganda or are not informed at all on what happened to the investigation and investigators into the alleged hijackers. for what concerns civil liberties not been curtailed and bush never overstepping bounds that is definetly propaganda. ah, and you dont have competitors...certainly none that are strong enough and suicidal enough to take you head on. excluding russia you never had any serious threats for the past 50+ years.
Not a random walk proponent. The experience of randomness is built into the ego-universe. But nothing happens by chance. From my perspective, it is known where the Dow will be in a hundred years. Buy and hold still works in theory. Analysis is a kind of judgement. Selection, ranking...all of these are relative to judgement, which has a way of binding you to perception...which is how the world is made and maintained. So if you can't keep it simple, you should question it. The simplest way is a path of non-judgement, non-analysis. The only way this is possible is to give over all decision-making to your Guide. Everyone has this Guide. Once you see the logic and the benefits of this, you would be more inclined to consider it. On such a path, you do not plan. You literally wake up each day without a plan, and just listen. If your Guide ever thought that you should buy or sell something - timing the market - you can be sure it will supply you. But this implies the Guide needs the market to supply your needs. This is not so, because the Guide works miracles from an abundant supply. He does not believe anyone need lose for you to gain. This is actually a belief He would guide you away from. It is the belief in scarcity and sacrifice that run the world, and it is these beliefs He would steer you away from, including the belief that you need anything. This is because you have everything as you were originally created. And since perception has not been able to change your created state, you still have everything. So he steers you away from the idea that you, or anyone can sacrifice, even if you thought you wanted to. The market mimics what is happening at deeper levels of the mind. Seemingly separate minds are making agreements, taking turns playing the role of punishee and punisher relative to the idea of guilt. This is all scripted and represents the unGuided will. This will is respected by the Guide. If another is determined to punish himself, the Guide is willing to keep it all within the family...seeing both you and him as one...giving you what he is determined to sacrifice. The bottom line is you need not worry about anything, so long as you are Guided. That's ultimately what makes you happy because the Guide represents an ancient will that you abandoned in order to analyze things within a world of perception. The will the Guide represents is your will, and it is the only will that brings you constant joy. I trade one will for another. One will analyzes within a world of doubt and uncertainty. The other is certain and simply knows. This is the one that makes you happy. This is the one that leads you out of a world that only exists because of your faith-based investments in it. Meanwhile, I am not about behavioral modification. All events in time and space are neutral. So I do not say that trading is either right or wrong, good or bad. It's just that an unguided, analysis based lifestyle is generally one of scarcity, whether you make millions or not. The ability to exchange rapidly and frequently without friction is for your economy like oil is for an engine. Exchange is parable to communication. The world was made to block communication. I am for what restores communication. This also restores abundance. You can use the market to punish yourselves. I am for eliminating the guilt that compels you to punish yourselves. When you have mercy on yourself, you will find that your beliefs will change the way you perceive and analyze the market...enabling you to find ways and means, and experience a semblance of abundance. But true abundance comes from a fully Guided lifestyle. Actually, that is the only "life" there is in this world. Jesus
aaron russo talks about his friendship with rockefeller and his goal to microchip the population: <embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1263677258215075609&hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed>
Bit, Same offer I made to Harry Trader stands for you if you'll visit the US - - big car, handgun, busty companion.
trading places producer and ex-silver/gold trader aaron russo full interview with alex jones...fighting cancer and the new wolrd order: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918&q=Historic+Aaron+Russo
Government Report: Bio-Weapons Could Be Used To Combat Overpopulation MoD dossier outlines nightmare vision of new world order, ethnic cleansing, class warfare, brain chips by 2035 Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet Monday, April 9, 2007 A British government Ministry of Defence report outlines a nightmare future society in which the population are forced to accept brain chips, immigration and urbanization ravages communities, class warfare ensues, and biological and neutron weapons are used to combat overpopulation. The MoD's Development, Concepts & Doctrine Center drew up the document to crystallize the "future strategic context" likely to face Britain's armed forces, according to a report in the london guardian today. Since every deliberate action of government and industry is working to realize this future, we should look at this as a strategy plan rather than a warning of things to come. The report hypothesizes what the world will be like in under 30 years and is an "analysis of the key risks and shocks" the planet is likely to face. It's predictions include; - The development of neutron weapons that destroy living organs but not buildings and "make a weapon of choice for extreme ethnic cleansing in an increasingly populated world." Such weapons would be dispersed by means of unmanned vehicles, leading to "application of lethal force without human intervention, raising consequential legal and ethical issues." - Within 30 years implanted brain chips as standard for all citizens in developed nations. - A mass revolt on behalf of the middle classes of the developed world in opposition to rampant immigration, an urban under-class and the deterioration of social order. - The revival of Marxism as a replacement for religion in an increasingly morally relativist age. - Unchecked globalization that effectively ends the nation state and leads to wars based on territorial belief systems rather than country against country. - A sharp decline in the population of white Europeans but an 81% increase in the population of sub-Saharan Africa and that of Middle Eastern countries by 132%. - Endemic unemployment, instability and threat to the social order as a result of population increase. - The emergence of a "terrorist coalition," an alliance of belief systems that oppose the state, from environmentalists to "ultra-nationalists" and remnants of religious groups. The clear implication from this report is that any political or religious group that expresses opposition to the atheistic and dictatorial agenda of the state will be collectively demonized as terrorists and targeted for elimination and ethnic cleansing. This is the very new world order that the establishment have sought to create by allowing rampant immigration, using the progress of technology to enslave us, launching endless war and shaping the course of history to construct a prison planet. The elite are deliberately steering world events and engaging in psychological warfare to achieve this self-fulfilling apocalypse. They are hell-bent on manufacturing an end-times scenario similar to that described in Revelations, and whether you believe in the Bible or not, our future is being decided by maniacal psychopaths sworn to destroy humanity. Every time we study government white papers and strategy documents, whether it be RAND, PNAC or any other major think tank, we come across an obsession with thinning the population by means of horrific acts of ethnic cleansing. In this instance, the plan isn't even veiled under the umbrella of terrorism, it clearly implies that states will deploy weapons of mass destruction to wipe out huge swathes of the population, and particularly those who express opposition to government. "...advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." Who wrote these words in their own strategy document? The Nazis? The regime of Pol Pot? No, it was Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, William Kristol, Donald Rumsfeld and the rest of the Neo-Con collaborators that formed the Project For a New American Century - the ideological framework of the Bush administration. Armed Forces Journal, a mouthpiece for the military-industrial complex, last year carried a strategy plan for completely redrawing the borders of the Middle East written by retired Major Ralph Peters. The document cites peak oil, an economic crash in 2008 and global warming as reasons for a chaotic convergence that will require harsh action on behalf of government. "Oh, and one other dirty little secret from 5,000 years of history," writes Peters, "Ethnic cleansing works." "There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing." Ethnic cleansing is also popular amongst the establishment scientific community who advocate mass scale eugenics programs to "cull" humanity down to manageable levels. One such example is Dr. Erik Pianka, who made headlines last year when he gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus. The vast majority of his audience, students, scientists and professors alike, stood and cheered when Pianka labeled humanity a bacteria that had to be eliminated. Similar sentiments are echoed by people like Prince Philip, who in the foreword to his 1986 book If I Were an Animal, wrote, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation." "The simplest answer is that the world's population should be about two billion, and we've got about six billion now," media mogul Ted Turner told E Magazine, an environmentalist publication. Turner went even further in an interview with Audubon Magazine. "A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." In a 1991 interview with the UNESCO Courier, Jacques-Yves Cousteau, the famous Emmy award winning film producer who went on to be a kingpin of the environmental movement said, "It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day." The global elite and the military-industrial complex have already sworn to inflict genocide to ethnically cleanse world population down to levels that are more easy to control and enslave. This is the ultimate end game of the New World Order - giving birth to the apocalypse and manufacturing hell on earth. No longer can this be dismissed as a paranoid conspiracy theory when the very architects of this horror are openly discussing it on a regular basis in their own planning documents.
EU Federal Superstate Becoming A Reality European globalists no longer even pretend the people will have a say Steve Watson Infowars.net Wednesday, April 18, 2007 In a telling U-turn British Prime Minister Tony Blair has stated that the EU no longer needs a constitution and should instead "opt for a less ambitious new treaty that would not require a referendum." In other words Blair is acknowledging that the people have seen through the legislation to create a federal superstate so the European globalist elite need to change the wording and pass it without letting the people vote on it. Blair's spokesman said an amending treaty would not require a referendum "in the same way that for the last 50 years other treaties of the kind that we're envisaging haven't needed a referendum". Blair echoed comments made by Downing Street earlier in the year that hinted towards implementation of a "mini constitution" over which it would 'not be necessary" to hold a referendum. The latest stealth movements come on the back of leaked documents from late last year revealing that the British government is to launch a multi-million pound propaganda war to force the British people to love the European Union and Brussels bureaucrats. Every Whitehall department is to appoint a spin doctor responsible for promoting the EU. And Downing Street will draw up an 'EU Grid' to make sure stories portraying Brussels in a good light are leaked to the media on a regular basis. These include promoting the 'EU brand' by linking to popular European events and institutions such as the Eurovision song contest, the Cannes Film Festival and the UEFA soccer organisation that runs the Champions League tournament - even though none of them has anything to do with the EU. The British government has previously said that if the public voted no they would continue to hold referendums until the public voted yes. Now it seems they won't even do that and are ready to simply sign over British sovereignty without giving the public a say whatsoever. The EU constitution was shot down in 2005 by French and Dutch no votes. However, ever since then critics have leveled that the constitution is being implemented anyway, clause by clause, as if the No votes had not even happened. Whilst the major countries have failed to win over their populations into relinquishing their sovereignty, over half of the now 27 countries in the EU have said yes to the constitution. In 2005 British MP Daniel Hannan conducted research into this back door implementation for the London Telegraph: "Formal ratification by all 25 states is regarded in Brussels as a technicality. To all intents and purposes, the EU is carrying on as though the constitution were already in force. Most of the institutions that it would have authorized are either up and running already, or in the process of being established." Hannan wrote. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose country holds the EU's six-month presidency, wants to resuscitate the treaty and the subject will be a main topic of debate at an EU leaders meeting in June. Last month at the EU summit in Berlin, Merkel as representative of all European leaders oversaw the signing of a document called Declaration on the Future of Europe, which called for new 'institutional reforms'. The declaration was veiled as a celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome, but in reality contained specific references to attempts to have a new EU treaty in place by 2009. Senior British Cabinet sources have warned that the European globalists including Blair and Merkel are pushing hard for Brussels to be given a full-time unelected president, who would serve a five year term and speak as the voice of Europe on the world stage. Insiders have told the press that the major european leaders are also prepared - without consulting their Cabinets - to endorse full-time defence and foreign ministers for the whole EU. German Chancellor Merkel has also previously stated that the European Union should aim to create a common army within the next 50 years and also have armed police to operate with impunity across borders. Reforms to strengthen the European Parliament could undermine the ability of member states to opt out of EU laws, as Britain does at present. All this is being slowly implemented without the consent of the public in each member state and despite the previous no votes in Holland and France on these very issues. Under the original draft text of the proposed EU constitution (PDF link), first presented in 2004, 16 articles were unveiled as the first piece of a constitutional text being drawn up for the Convention on the Future of Europe. Sweeping aside objections, the document established the European Union on a "federal basis", enjoying "primacy over the law of the member states". This means that were it to be implemented countries would lose control of foreign policy and defence and would be stripped of their sovereign power to legislate in almost all areas of national life. Remember that the EU at its inception was supposed to be a simple economic agreement between individual states. The areas it now seeks to dominate also include public health, social policy, transport, justice, agriculture, fisheries, energy, economic and social cohesion, the environment, internal and external trade, and consumer protection. Under the original draft of the constitution Article 3 gives the EU powers to "co-ordinate the economic policies of the member states", which covers fiscal policy. Article 4 says "the Union shall have competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy". Virtually all the current activities of the British Government for example would fall under the "exclusive" or "shared competence" of the EU, meaning that Westminster would be prohibited from legislating unless Brussels choose to waive its primacy. In their important history of the EU, The Great Deception, British authors Christopher Booker and Richard North, concluded that the 27 member nations now entangled in the union have ceded their sovereignty in a carefully planned stealth operation. They grudgingly credit european globalists with accomplishing "a slow-motion coup dâetat: the most spectacular coup dâetat in history." The authors of The Great Deception summarized the effect of the Treaty of Rome: "Thus did the central deception of the whole story become established. From now on, the real agenda, political integration, was to be deliberately concealed under the guise of economic integration. Building Europe was to be presented as a matter of trade and jobs." In addition dissidents and outcasts such as Vladimir Bukovksy have warned that an elite plan has long existed whereby the EU would be hijacked and transformed into a Soviet style Socialist superstate that would eliminate the individual nation state's power and create a governing body with no accountability or direct representation. The current state of the EU is a prime example of why Americans should by extremely wary of talk of a North American Union as a "Security Prosperity Partnership". As the EU has proven a simple economic treaty can slowly be transformed into an all encompassing unelected supranational federal government.