I love you murray and you're one of my favorite ET'ers. But I think you are wrong on this one. The student loan debt forgiveness would not have benefited "rich white kids." It would have been a Godsend for many struggling with a debt burden that the government itself helped create and is pinning many down so tight that even a nominally middle-class existence is out of reach. Trump's trillionaire corprate tax plan could have paid for the whole debt forgiveness program. Why is that not the real "socialist scam?"
%% Mainly because the rich white + any color kids signed a contract to repay it; no wonder cost went up so extreme= gov goofs-slave trick .Like ''free health care'' Free stuff, free train ride, free gas-healthcare , free showers, free burial................ Of course you are right in one sense. IF you think white skin is real= put a white paper next to your skin LOL-true. I know the marxist mob loves to sow strife- racial- class divides, as NPR does all the time
Actually Student Loan Forgiveness mainly benefits upper middle-class white families. Student Loan Forgiveness Is Regressive Whether Measured by Income, Education, or Wealth: Why Only Targeted Debt Relief Policies Can Reduce Injustices in Student Loans https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/WP75-Looney_updated_1.pdf As outlined in the Forbes article - Study: Most Student Debt Belongs To High-Wealth Households https://www.forbes.com/sites/presto...gs-to-high-wealth-households/?sh=29980ff63ba4 Here is some additional information: https://www.crfb.org/blogs/bidens-student-debt-cancellation-plan-still-regressive Oops: Biden’s student loan bailout still mostly helps high-earners, nonpartisan analysis confirms "The Administration’s student debt cancellation proposal is costly, inflationary, will drive up higher education costs, and will deliver the majority of the benefits to those in the top half of the income spectrum,” the experts conclude. https://www.based-politics.com/2022...s-high-earners-nonpartisan-analysis-confirms/ The Top 20% just 6X the benefits out of the student debt relief deal. https://fee.org/articles/top-20-get...-cancellation-than-bottom-20-new-study-finds/ The Distributional Effects of Student Loan Forgiveness https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/BFI_WP_2020169.pdf There is an entire thread dedicated to Biden's Student Loan Forgiveness proposals - https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ent-loan-cancellation-is-becoming-cle.357329/
Johnson can try to appease the MAGA GOP House crowd by delaying the Ukraine funding vote. However the outcome is inevitable. GOP House chair: Johnson has no way out of Ukraine floor vote https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4473343-mccaul-johnson-ukraine-aid-floor-vote/ The GOP chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee was bullish Friday on the chamber delivering U.S. military assistance to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, despite the “brainwashing” of some within his caucus who oppose foreign spending because of the crisis at the southern border. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was committed to eventually moving President Biden’s national security supplemental request, though the pathway remains unclear amid fierce pushback from the far right of the GOP. Speaking during a discussion hosted by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington, D.C., McCaul said Johnson faces two challenging options: bring the supplemental to the floor and face a potential move to oust him from the far right, or let Ukraine backers in the party force the vote and undermine his power. “I think that’s going to be a difficult choice for him, because if they’re threatening a motion to vacate, it’s a tough decision,” he said, referring to the rule that allows one member to force a vote on removing the Speaker from his position. “I don’t see anyway of getting out of Israel, Indo Pacific and eventually Ukraine coming to the floor. He’s either going to have to do it — put it on the floor himself — or it’s going to be by virtue of a discharge petition, which is a complete evisceration of his power, because it basically says we’re going to do this without the Speaker being in charge,” the chairman continued. Lawmakers could “discharge” legislation if a majority of members signed onto a petition to release it – a difficult path that would require most Democrats teaming up with at least a handful of Republicans. While Republicans hold a slim majority, Democrats could lose members of their own party in a discharge petition vote over progressive opposition to sending U.S. military support for Israel. McCaul said Democrats would struggle to win over Republicans, even if they are supportive of Ukraine. “I think Republicans supportive of Ukraine wouldn’t support a discharge, because it’s really going around leadership altogether,” McCaul said. (More at above url)
This should be obvious by now. But for those who missed it, Mike Johnson is funded by Russia. Mike Johnson Accepted Donations From Oligarch Linked to Convicted Russian Agent https://theintellectualist.com/campaign-finance-controversy-johnson/
Someone should remind Johnson that by being willing to step into McCarthy's shoes he was part of that purge. ‘We're wounded:’ Speaker Mike Johnson struggles to lead GOP after ‘unnecessary purging’ https://www.rawstory.com/raw-invest...uggles-to-lead-gop-after-unnecessary-purging/
'You’re both traitors': Speaker Johnson's thumbs-up photo-op with Trump doesn't go well https://www.rawstory.com/trump-johnson-2667318263/
Republicans Push For Discharge Petition Against Mike Johnson https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-push-discharge-petition-against-mike-johnson-1872277 Campaign group Republicans for Ukraine are launching a six-figure advertising blitz urging GOP House members to support a discharge petition to pass a bill containing additional military aid for Ukraine, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to bring it to a vote. On February 13 the Senate passed a $95 billion package including an additional $60 billion in aid for Ukraine, but it must also be approved by the House before President Joe Biden can sign it into law. Currently Johnson is refusing to hold a vote on the package, which he claimed is "silent on the most pressing issue facing our country," in a reference to illegal immigration. On Wednesday Republicans for Ukraine announced a "six-figure digital ad" campaign aimed at the 10 House Republicans they seem most likely to sign a discharge petition. A discharge petition, which would require the support of 218 House members including at least four Republicans, could allow the aid package to go to a vote without Johnson's backing. Supporters of Ukraine are confident they have the numbers needed to pass the package in the House if they can get it to a vote. Speaking to Newsweek, Republicans for Ukraine spokesperson Gunner Ramer said: "For generations, the Republican Party prided itself on standing up to dictators and leading the free world. Many Republicans, including many in Congress, still identify with that party and that role for America. Right now the critical issue in the world is whether free countries will help defeat Putin in Ukraine. "Republicans have a chance to make history, but only if they get to vote. That's why they should sign a discharge petition—it only takes four, but there's safety in numbers. These 10 members have been leaders on Ukraine and American national security in the past, and it's time for them to be leaders again." The 10 House Republicans being targeted by the campaign are Mike Gallagher (WI), Ken Buck (CO), Mike McCaul (TX), Mike Rogers (AL), Mike Turner (OH), Don Bacon (NE), Steve Womack (AR), Jake Ellzey (TX), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA) and Dan Crenshaw (TX). The campaign features a one-minute ad in which "lifelong Republican voters" explain why they think the House should provide additional support to Ukraine. In the video, which has received over one million views on YouTube, one Republican voter from California comments: "If we don't support Ukraine I fear China could potentially see that as a signal where they believe that they can invade their neighbours too."