As expected http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13245&perpage=6&pagenumber=8 What a farce indeed ! As if they wanted to spread islamism integrism everywhere ...
Now that Communism has fallen, a new ennemy is needed by the war makers it will be the III World and if you don't understand how America is perceived out of its frontier here it is : http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Globalization/Economic_Genocide.html Economic Genocide "The majority of the American people are asking themselves why there are so many people in the world who harbor resentment and even hatred against them. Many Americans do not know, or if they do know, they do not want to believe that an economic genocide is claiming a huge number of victims. In the past decade in Latin America, the number of poor people has increased by 11 million, reaching 211 million, according to statistics compiled by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Added to the 89 million indigents, the total number of poor is estimated at 300 million. In the Arab nations there are even more poor people, and the worldwide total of poor is in the billions. The scale of involvement by the United States in the life of the planet has made it, whether by deed or omission, the main agent responsible for all this incalculable want. This does not justify the massacre of Sept. 11, but it ought to cause us to consider how to create a better world. Might this be an opportunity to rekindle the expectations at the end of World War II, when the world was still capable of enthusiastic optimism about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Or is the only response collective immolation? This topic is much too big to entrust to a single government or a single nation. Not even Argentina, weighed down as it is with 40 consecutive months of recession, can exempt itself from responsibility for the future."
And one cannot pretend any more that this Economic Genocide has not been perpetrated on purpose: "THE GRAND CHESSBOARD - American Primacy And It's Geostrategic Imperatives," Zbigniew Brzezinski [head of the trilateral founded by Rockfeller and former head of National Securities under Carter, it is also him who financed Ben Laden in Afghanistan: not a coïncidence...], Basic Books, 1997. p.40 quoted by http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America's power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being." [What does he means ] "Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."æ (p. 211) [Emphasis added] [What does he means once again ] "...To put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." (p.40)
How do you think that the III World react when they are confronted to this barbarian behavior and the hypocrisis in front of the medias of Democracy Savior : "The Unthinkable is Becoming Normal." http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0420-05.htm "A study released just before Christmas 1991 by the Medical Educational Trust revealed that more 200,000 Iraqi men, women and children were killed or died as a direct result of the American-led attack. This was barely reported, and the homicidal nature of the "war'' never entered public consciousness in this country, let alone America. " Worst : "The Pentagon's deliberate destruction of Iraq's civilian infrastructure, such as power sources and water and sewage plants, together with the imposition of an embargo as barbaric as a medieval siege, produced a degree of suffering never fully comprehended in the West. Documented evidence was available, volumes of it; by the late 1990s, more than 6,000 infants were dying every month, and the two senior United Nations officials responsible for humanitarian relief in Iraq, Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck, resigned, protesting the embargo's hidden agenda. Halliday called it "genocide". "As of last July, the United States, backed by the Blair government, was wilfully blocking humanitarian supplies worth $5.4bn, everything from vaccines and plasma bags to simple painkillers, all of which Iraq had paid for and the Security Council had approved. "