The new CLK

Discussion in 'Politics' started by WCOMtrader, Oct 31, 2002.

  1. true... true... but if I had six figures just laying around the coffee table... why not?
     
    #21     Nov 5, 2002
  2. http://autozine.kyul.net/gallery/mercedes/sl55.htm

    sorry.. couldn't find the specs. The price is a bit cheaper than a 360 Modena, and a bit faster than a Modena.

    It may seem like a waste of money for buying such expensive toys, but at least you have the bragging rights.

    If speed is the main thing. Might as well trade in a cow for a chevy nova on bricks... get a new motor, blower, etc... spend less than 20 grand (including the cow) and be able to beat a 200 thousand dollar Lamborghini. I hear this from southerners all the time... gees.
     
    #22     Nov 5, 2002
  3. This is so true. I didn't get the vehicle (Benz) because it was the fastest thing out there. It was something that I liked. There are so many refurbished muscle cars out there that could handle many of today's speed duels.

    An old Charger tricked out. Bring out an Olds 442 after a little transmission work. Heck, my Buick Regal SR from '77 was nowhere near its showroom stock condition. Not only was there a transplanted power plant, it had a nitrous unit. I took away a lot of weekend racing capital back in those days.

    I think my upcoming pet project might be to take an older vehicle and modernize it for a Real head turning show piece. And I am definitely sure that it would be at a fraction of the cost of my new car. :)
     
    #23     Nov 5, 2002
  4. me being young... I'm more into the newer cars, but still... older cars are nice. Sorry not an expert, so I don't know the years... but I really love the older Chevelles and Camaros. The sound of a winding turbo of a honda is nice... but the roar from those domestics... :eek: The new Z06 is nice. I was thinking about that today. Does 12 second 1/4 miles, over a 1G of lateral acceleration straight from the dealership all for 50 grand... that's a bargain. Throw in a supercharger and spiff up the suspension, that should beat almost anything at the race track.

    As far as the plastics... didn't know that it improved the safety of a car. I thought it made it worse. What I don't really like is all the plastic in the interior. For example, the kind of interior you'd find in a new Ford. It just looks cheesy in my opinion

    Andy
     
    #24     Nov 5, 2002
  5. Ouch, stay away from those same camaros that you speak of if they are from the early seventies and hoped up just a bit. In my youth, we were clocking ten and change for 1/4 times. Chicago's south side, the rainbow beach area after hours provided many memories.

    I remember a guy who had an AMC Javelin that would have given you lunch and taken all your change from your fifty grand plastic joy. There were quite a few blistering quick Dodge's (hemi's) around there also. Today's toys are quite tame in comparison. Those truly were the days. You could buy a NASCAR monster right off the showroom floor. :)
     
    #25     Nov 5, 2002
  6. #26     Nov 5, 2002

  7. And I understand that you own at least one of them?
     
    #27     Nov 5, 2002
  8. nah...he's the one with the Russian cosmojet lolol.
     
    #28     Nov 7, 2002
  9. got to agree with buzzy..
    its a girls car...

    give it to your missus
     
    #29     Nov 11, 2002
  10. mercedes a chick car ?? you are out of your mind !!


    best,

    surf:confused:
     
    #30     Nov 11, 2002