Seriously speaking, neither John McCain nor Ron Paul belong on that list. Neither would ever advocate the kind of crap that Dubya, the shit standard if ever there was one, for Republican stupidity and venality (beating out Nixon, which is saying something; Nixon came up with no-knock, but he probably never even thought that torture would ever be considered a viable option for the US), came up with. His judgment of Obama, unfortunately, is almost exactly correct. The post Constitutional bs is red meat for the paranoia of the right, but beyond that the rest of it is on the money. Not that Obama belongs on the list either, just to be clear.
Instead of whining (typical rightie), why don't YOU write up the profiles of Reid, Pelosi and Frank that you think should have been included? They have to be humorous and pretty much accurate, not just the usual right-wing slander that has no correlation to the real world. No pictures allowed. Go for it, PJ O'Snark.
Anyone and everyone could be on that list because the writing is cariacature. Had the writer chosen, for tone, to accentuate the subjects' strengths, instead of failings, I have little doubt readers here would be saying, "bullshit, Obama/Reid/Pelosi are not good in any way", etc.
but then the writer wouldn't be be the same loser pissed off at those who do not chose to be deviants. He would be the rarest of exceptions. A lefty, tolerant of peoples rights to think and worship differently.
Once "those of faith" start keeping their views to themselves and especially their views out of politics and out of our schools and government then you will find the left to be exceptionally tolerant.
Once Canadians start keeping their views to themselves and especially their views out of US politics then you will find the right here on ET to be exceptionally tolerant.