It is a basic econometric pattern of any trend in a hypothetical world.It doesnt always correspond,if not to say more it correspondes only on a few occasions. It could be B2B 2R 2B for long as it could B2R 2R 2B or B2B2B2B 2R 2B 2R 4B 4R etc etc etc etc....the same way, for the same 1-2-3 points.
Logical calculus has nothing to do with your approach and the vector is not the unit of measurement. You are consistently borrowing concepts from real discipline but I think you have no idea what you are talking about cause you sound like you have an aphasia. If the fractal fails, it can't be a f*king fractal anymore, it couldn't be a fractal in the first place to begin with. It never was. What was is spydertrader posting his charts with 1,2 and 3 on them. And all of them if degaped with the following day produce incorrect order of events. Every single one of them. How the hell he could possibly trade off those charts if the manner in which he assigned the order of events was inconsistent with market operation. As soon as the person asks themselves that question, they will immediately realize that you people are fakes and frauds.
You looking at the chart and seeing LTL being broken with close in the zone produces resumption - this is induction and a naive one. Sane person taking this as a rule and testing to see if it holds true - this is deductive activity. Anybody can degap charts posted by spydertrader and see for themselves that HE GOT THE ORDER OF EVENTS WRONG for the next day. Supposedly he was trading off those charts. Sane person seeing that all his charts anticipated wrong what must develop on the next day in order for those annotations to be correct - this is analysis. Coming to conclusion that he and you are fakes and frauds is simply logical. For everything else there is a master card.
When someone is saying the he`s started trading 50+ years ago and he is saying that time and time againg,it would be enough to get that he is so far away from trading now.It`s like the veteran`s memories about the WWI.
The purpose of annotations is for a trader to keep track of where she is in the order of the events. Every single chart annotated by spydertrader can be degapped and compared with the next day to see if "what must come next" based on today's annotations has developed tomorrow. Without a fail, it never did. Spydertrader never got WMCN right. Not a single time. Doing due diligence on his crap is time consuming. But it is worth it. Any sane person can review his charts, look at the next day, see that based on gaussians of various thickness his pre-flight check was wrong every single time. The first question comes to mind: if he was supposed to have traded off his annotations -- ARE YOU F*NG MAD. Am I talking to a bot? A hershey bot? WTF?
Another example of avoiding the hard truth "Jack! Jack! Lighten up, man! The likelihood that you can make me feel like shit in a pure print medium is nil. Probably not even in person. You're not that good. If I REALLY wanted to rag on you, I could make you cry. In print. Intimations of mortality. Regrets. Trespasses unforgiven. Opportunities missed. Time wasted. Dreams not now achievable. The feeling of helplessness. But I digress. And for your demented information, I spend all 390 minutes of RMH communing with market metrics that would give you a hard-on, if you could still get it up. Metrics that tell you why markets sometimes top without an FTT. That tell you why a succession of reverses that look like FTTs are really bouncing off of a trend line you can't see. That indicate continuation without hurting your head trying to divine what those sluggish volume bars are going to do. Using NQ ITSELF as a leading indicator for itself. All with no fear or anxiety because they are all I quantified, coded, properly thresholded, deconflicted, and tested." Jack "the bullshiter" Hershey slipped away quietly.
I am very f*ing informed, believe me. This is no trashing. This is a statement of fact. We just had the VE on ES didn't close in the zone, and low and behold, there was another freaking resumption. Only a blind person can't see that. It would've been another loss for a trader following your rules. You were very specific about the zones and the closes. I am not your regular variety bypasser who takes the crack at you for fun. I am very thorough, having researched everything and contemplated carefully what has been written on the subject. This is not a trash talk. This a pure unadulterated truth. You are a fraud and so is Spydetrader. Your meetings were prescreened not to allow people with any brains and self-respect. Who else is gong to sit through the demonstration of trading approach on hand drawn bars instead of real market. What a freaking joke!
As a follower of Market Profile I found This Article about new indicators based on Market Profile Theory to be very useful.