you show an interesting relationship to psychology and trading ... and elephants and leaves. Talking about the relationship between them seperatly can also bring up some interesting conversation. I saw a thread that had a link to rain man. Also i note that people who know things tend to be very good at the English language. so much so that i may misunderstanding. Your post can mean many things to many people. there are other characteristics that i see. like a great knowledge of certain things. I often see quotes from great sciences that i wonder where they cam from. do people make them up? do they actually research them ? do they memorize them? these tendencies all have a familiar flavor. unfortunately language is not a hot spot for me. differentiating between what is literal or symbolic is not a strong trait. there fore everything in this thread will be deemed symbolic. as for elephants i really like them they mourn over their dead, they show many emotions.,a fear of mice and alot of things about them are interesting. I find there ears and noses to be spectacular. Darwinian at its best. like the giraffes neck. what is surprising to me is that though they have a long nose it is also flexible and acts like a hand moving left to right within tusks. This shows how evolution effects animals differently the giraffe grows a long neck to make up for not having hands where the elephant develops a long nose for the same reason. leafs are also interesting they are essentially a efficient solar panel taking energy from the sun and water through stems the energy from the sun is used to process water brought up by capillary action... i think we should open an new thread about gravity and capillary action here.. if there is interest pm me i really like that it is the only action that defies gravity. as for me having a moustach, im afraid i have no idea what you are referring to. either i am too new here or i am not well read enough (on a topic) to understand. if it is the later i apologize. also to some degree i apologize for the in coherency of my post. but probably the in coherency is a good thing. im really curious about the moustach remark because i do have a gotea. it is well groomed and right under my nose, perpendicular to it. as most are. Maybe the moustach remark is in regards to you believing ii am some one else which is a battle i cant win. some times when i shave i have no start point. Most people have a start point. I have even begun start to shave where there is no hair! but most of the time i have a good sense of direction like the norm. i tend to use soap instead of shaving cream i find it is much more efficiant. any further remarks about my shaving, moustaches or goteas are welcome. I enjoy sharing my shaving style with men only as for remarks on elephants noses ears or plant life it is something i must stay away form as i can talk on and on about them. Nebuchadnezzar i think this is the first post of yours that i liked why the change of hart ? or am i mistaking you form some one else as i often do? what was meant by me having a moustach? does it have any thing to do with elephants? are you all on here everyday?
Faster Fractal. This utterance suggests that you are using transitive inference, which is a form of relational reasoning in which objects are ordered on a single dimension. The market simply doesn't operate that way.
Bar 17 (1700) on your chart is a VE and it DID NOT close in the zone descibed in hershey's rule 8 ("8. On VEâs the FTT will show up after M1 and M2 sub-fractals when VE closes in the zone between the old and new LTL. Otherwise, if the close is NOT in the described zone, reverse on the VE close and use the VE as the new point 1 (See step 1 above) of next parallelogram.") What would happen if you reversed short on the close of Bar 17 (1700)? According to hershey it should have been used as point 1 for short trend. Can you see now that he is full of crap? Do you still believe that he or spydertrader have ever traded the crap they have been spreading for years?
If bar 17 is the first VE then we have to apply "rule" 8: "...8. On VEâs the FTT will show up after M1 and M2 sub-fractals when VE closes in the zone between the old and new LTL. Otherwise, if the close is NOT in the described zone, reverse on the VE close and use the VE as the new point 1 (See step 1 above) of next parallelogram. ..." Meaning bar 17 is a new pt1, we go short at the close of that bar, place a green bookmark on the top of bar 17. Bar 19 ends the two bar container but we don't exit until that bar crosses the green line. The result is a loss. Because we followed rule 8 we had a pt1 and what must come next tells that the low of bar 18 was probably point 2 WMCN is a point 3 that's why we would hold through bar 19. Damn... there must be a flaw in those rules.
stupid question, whats a green bookmark and whats WMCN again i don't know the lingo but this has popped up a few times and im curious
There shouldn't be a "what if". This is supposed to be binary. In addition so far the focus was only on the price. All doubts should disappear after annotating volume, correct?
That pretty much sums up the 5 years of hershey/spydertrader's journals. Now hershey is gonna post one pager addressing a random subject completely ignoring the fact that rule 8 doesn't work.