You are babbling again. If you can't or will not address my arguments, why bother responding? Hopefully you weren't projecting with your last post.
It would be interesting to tally the impressions of people first watching the videos. This can be done, perhaps outside this US, not that it ever would be. It is fascinating to watch Democrat politicians calling for regulation involving certain uses of AI. Impartial weighing on evidence of corruption abounds, perhaps? As it is, AI is being given exclusive determination on people's identities in certain situations. There are several AI related articles in Ars Technica that are relevant to this discussion.
Are you aware that a huge majority of police types are Pro-Trump? Is it a surprise they welcomed in the Trump supporters? Also just because they were welcomed into the public area, doesn't mean they were escorted into the private offices and the chamber itself. And how many stopped and walked away when they were told to go outside? Nice try though, Tucker got you fooled as usual.
Fox News literally admitted to lying about the elections IN COURT. Tucker carlsons legal defense for a court case was no one who’s actually coherent should believe what tucker and Fox News says or publishes. You dumb fucks are so delusional you just ignore what’s right in front of your face.
lol, who's Tucker Carlson, did he break in the capitol, GoPee, lol. Now, about Ray Ray, is that the sum total of what you can tell us about Ray Ray? Zilch, Nothing, Nada? Pittiful attempt to distract from the issue. You better get a troll school brushup! LOL GoPeeeeeee
Not saying that you are not a reliable source of characterizations, but I really want to the see evidence before reaching a final conclusion. ALL the evidence.