The man whose Social Security number is being used by the U.S. President

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wilburbear, Feb 25, 2012.

  1. The Plot Thickens

    An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama:

    Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March 1977.

    Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that,
    his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

    Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no
    reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None

    Now comes the best part. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

    Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

    The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's
    death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there
    were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

    The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.

    Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born" there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.
  2. Oh Lord, really? Come on, really?

    May I please ask that both sides of our political spectrum join me in this one? Really?

  3. 377OHMS


    10-minutes ago you called us all punks. Now you want help?
  4. I purposely added a disclaimer that many of you don't fit that category. I respect your opinions, even though we disagree on many things.

    But this one, really? You gotta support me on this one, right?

    Snopes 'False'

    Not only false, just plain funny. And sad of course.


  5. ahwwww....... where there's smoke there's fire.

    we'll keep hammerin' away til we get somethin'.
  6. pspr


    Snopes (which swings left btw) calls this claim nonsense.

    c, instead of saying "really" a half a dozen times why don't you take a minute and do some real research to see if the claim is true or not? Your present method of denial is useless and irritating.
  7. O'bama does act a bit French...:cool:
  8. pspr


    Yeah, like a French Fry - slick and oily.
  9. So Snopes is in on the conspiracy too? I found several other links when I simply googled it.

    I see the word 'false' at snopes. I see this:
    1. Issued in Connecticut?

    President Obama's Social Security number (if he hasn't been issued a new one since his original one was spread all over the Internet) begins with the digits 042. While this is ordinarily an indication that the number was issued to someone living in Connecticut, the Social Security Administration says:

    One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

    So how did President Obama get a Social Security number with an Area Number reflecting residence (or mailing address) in Connecticut?
    In any event, there is no evidence whatever that President Obama's Social Securiy number was obtained by fraud.

    For a far more detailed discussion of this issue, please read this topic in our forum.

    Sorry about the 'really' I guess, a little too Seinfeld like. But, isn't this just more birther stuff?

  10. There you go, that explains it all.

    #10     Feb 25, 2012