You're failure to disclose your true intent while allowing others to act in reliance on your statement, operates identically to fraud, no different then were you to offer to sell someone a car, and tell the buyer that "It runs just great," while holding back your knowledge fact that when the car warms up for an hour, it stalls continuously. A person who allows another to rely on a mistake of fact that the other person knows or reasonably should know is a mistake, commits an act no different than fraud. So, you get self satisfaction out of watching others fall prey to your deliberate misrepresentations, effected by a wholesale failure to disclose and or correct the material mistakes of other with whom you communicate? How nobel. How impressive. You're a genuine hero. Of course, you haven't bothered to tell anyone how exactly the egg and sperm got together to create a human on this first occasion. So, since you wouldn't clarify your position previously, and having just stated that had anyone asked at the time, you would have done so, I'll now ask you to do it: How exactly did the first human egg and sperm appear on Earth and thereby conceive the first human?
I didn't fail to disclose any true or false intent, it is not my job to disclose intent to you. My intent was clear to me, that's all that is required. You asked what I thought was a stupid question, I gave an honest answer befitting of the question of how man "appeared" on earth. People around here think of things the way they will, it is not my job to pre clarify everything for them or explain my intent. If they are confused, not my problem actually, especially when their confusion is a source of entertainment. By the way, all entertainment occurs within the self, so it is all self satisfaction..... Aren't you supposed to be a $300 an hour _________, yet you made assumptions and ran with them without clarifying them? Think an opposing _________ would allow you to make false assumptions, knowing that eventually such false assumptions would make you look like an arse? LOL.... Do the math next time..... First human egg? I will answer that question when you can produce the first human egg. No evidence of a first human egg, no reason to answer your question with specificity. I never said there was a first human egg, or a first human being on this earth.... If I had to take a wild guess, I would guess.....my guess is that the egg came from the mother, and the sperm from the father.... Now, is God the Father and the Mother? Many theists think so..... Then again maybe that first egg and ovum came from a space ship..... Who knows?
Actually, it is your legal duty not to intentionally misrepresent or to permit others to knowingly rely on a material failure to disclose if your intention is for others to deterimentally rely on your failure. You admit above to knowing that others misunderstood you, and you failed to clarify, but rather allowed them to rely to their detriment on your silence, knowing that the silence was harmful. That's called common law fraud. So, you go ahead and think yourself all self rightious and superiour, but be glad that this isn't a real courtroom because you'd be heading right for the 8x8 at this very moment for about 5 days. Of course, this isn't the real world, but I'm only interested in practicing against a difficult witness, so once I achieve the requisite legal standard required, I'm done. Someone else can take you to task on chicken and the egg issue. There's no point in my continuing to debate you, because you're prepared to completely alter your testimony at any moment in order to maintain a lost argument. And, that frankly, makes you a stupendous bore.
"Actually, it is your legal duty not to intentionally misrepresent or to permit others to knowingly rely on a material failure to disclose if your intention is for others to deterimentally rely on your failure. Oh My God!!! ROTFLMAO.... Will someone please tell this ________ that this is the Chit Chat forum? Anyway.... I don't admit to knowing with certainty others misunderstand me, I am not a mind reader. They might be playing a game with me, maybe the joke is on me, who knows? Maybe you are a fool, maybe you are wise, I don't know, and certainly would not make a real life determination on the basis of chit chat, shit shat.... You are talking a crap game, especially when you make claims for which you have no proof, i.e. what I know, what my intentions are, etc. Chit chat is after all, not a proper setting for any real debate, it isn't a court of law, it is more like a bar where people say all kinds of shit.... Those who take this seriously, are seriously under a misconception. Ask Baron if he thinks chit chat stuff should be taken seriously?
Oh, so you've changed your mind, have you? This is not what you said before. What made you change your mind. And don't bother denying it, it's all in the other thread. Don't you hate the fact that we can go back and quote you? Doesn't that just frost your ass?? It must.
Let's get back to the issue at hand, shall we? We are summarizing the questions that Z refuses to answer, questions engendered by an examination of his posts and supported by direct quotes from him. This is always the process with Z. Let him make an error and then hammer him into the ground until he slinks away and starts a new thread. So... Who were you referring to when you used the phrase 'goose stepping' in this thread?
lol.. oh I know. You've just changed your argument. That's what intellectually dishonest people do. Don't you hate the fact that the evidence is in the other thread? Doesn't that just frost your ass? Who were you referring to with your evocation of Nazi Germany in this thread?