https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras . .
Damn, dude. I think you have some incorrect links of you want to go that deep. Here, fixed it for you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Whole shebang.
- COSMIC ANCESTRY? The chemistry leading to life may have begun shortly after the Big Bang, 13.8 billion years ago, during a habitable epoch when the Universe was only 10 to 17 million years old. Though the presence of life is confirmed only on the Earth, some scientists think that extraterrestrial life is not only plausible, but probable or inevitable. Probes and instruments have started examining other planets and moons in the Solar System and in other planetary systems for evidence of having once supported simple life, and projects such as SETI attempt to detect radio transmissions from possible extraterrestrial civilizations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia - Organic compounds Just as fascinating are suggestive astronomical findings, such as the Rosetta mission’s discovery of organic compounds on and around the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. This finding coincides nicely with Hoyle and Wickramasinghe’s demonstration that interstellar dust is partly made of organic molecules. https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/viruses-et-and-the-octopus-from-space-the-return-of-panspermia - Genesis to analyze the popular theory that the creation account in the book of Genesis follows the same literary framework, or is strikingly similar to other Ancient Near Eastern creation myths. No one is denying that there are some superficial similarities. However, when I read the Mesopotamian and Egyptian creation myths side-by-side with the book of Genesis, the substantial differences far outweigh the similarities. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/02/22/three-ancient-near-eastern-creation-myths/ - Can The Theory of Cosmic Ancestry Be Tested? Since 1996, specific updates follow each subtopic. General ones come last Find more tests in the Next pages and many more in the What'sNEW Index The theory of Cosmic Ancestry is a serious scientific theory, but it is not proven. As here presented, it probably contains mistakes. It is a working hypothesis, and many of its details are speculative. The direct evidence supporting it is thin. How could Cosmic Ancestry be proven? If true, it should have measurable consequences. How could we test them? https://www.panspermia.org/indexb.htm COSMIC ANCESTRY | Quick Guide Quick Guide to Cosmic Ancestry Forewords: Introduction | New Questions | Comparison | What'sNEW-Index-Scrapbook Origin: What Is Life? | Pasteur | RNA World | Bacteria | Comets Evolution: Neo-Darwinism | Viruses & HGT | Sex? | Introns | Tree of Life | Gaia The Logic: Evo. vs Crea. | 3rd Aternative | 2nd Law | Computer Models 1 | 2 | Progress? 1 | 2 | 3 | Evolution Prize Fred & Chandra: Interstellar Dust | Hoyle Interview | Chandra Wickramasinghe Tests: Tests | Mars Life | Moons | Old Genes | Old Life | Murchison Meteorite | Hale-Bopp | Tiny Comets? | Murchison 2 | Red K-B Objects | Bacteria In Orgueil | Balloon Test | Space Flu? | Microfossils | Stardust | CIDA | Moon Fossils | Human Genome Search | New Genetic Programs | Three Tests | Non-Genes | Cosmic Pathogens? | Cyanobacteria in Orgueil | Wordcount | Duplication Makes New Gene | 3 New Human Genes | Multicellularity | Cyanobacteria 2 | Very Old Genes | ...Software Management Philosophy: How Possible? | What Difference? | End & Big Bang | Beginning Afterwords: About Website | Replies - Index | ART COSMIC ANCESTRY | Quick Guide | Site Search | by Brig Klyce | All Rights Reserved