the londonkid report

Discussion in 'Journals' started by londonkid, Feb 17, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. londonkid

    londonkid

    you nailed it! so what I look to do is time entries in other markets based on these risk turns. there are other components obv.
     
    #21     Feb 17, 2016
  2. londonkid

    londonkid

    control denial. questions will go unanswered. logic fail. someone cannot differentiate between calling a level and calling an exact reversal point. Calling for a level to be hit is not the same as saying at what level price will turn then hit level. You trade vol? lol.
     
    #22     Feb 17, 2016
    fortydraws likes this.
  3. destriero

    destriero

    Thanks, very helpful.

    Exact reversal point? oic. Your definition of an exact reversal point is interesting:

    • londonkid: watch and learn Yesterday at 1:42 PM
    • londonkid: 1884 will be the low Yesterday at 1:41 PM
    • londonkid: if we trade down their

    • londonkid: but today's low aint coming out Yesterday at 1:40 PM
    • londonkid: yeah 1880 def possible Yesterday at 1:40 PM
    • londonkid: ok dest
     
    #23     Feb 17, 2016
  4. IOW, correct me if I'm wrong, you are looking at a symmetrical move to last october...I won't rule anything out in this market, but especially in these OpEx weeks...1810 to 2040 = 230 pts...Oct 15-Nov 15 = 244 pts.
     
    #24     Feb 17, 2016
  5. londonkid

    londonkid

    look at this guy. He even shows the chat where I call the low of the day to within 4 ticks. And here is Dest calling for the bear outside day lol. tool lol. pro tip - when arguing with someone dont argue their point lol

    chat7.png
     
    #25     Feb 17, 2016
  6. londonkid

    londonkid

    hey kommissar. I use symmetrical moves to note that others will enter at those levels but not in trading decisions. I never could find any consistency with opex plays.
     
    #26     Feb 17, 2016
  7. destriero

    destriero


    Thanks.

    So you called the low (84.00) yet you stated a minute earlier that 80.00 was "def possible." You don't see that as contradictory?

    Seriously, thanks again, great thread.

    • londonkid: watch and learn Yesterday at 1:42 PM
    • londonkid: 1884 will be the low Yesterday at 1:41 PM
    • londonkid: if we trade down their

    • londonkid: but today's low aint coming out Yesterday at 1:40 PM
    • londonkid: yeah 1880 def possible Yesterday at 1:40 PM
    • londonkid: ok dest
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2016
    #27     Feb 17, 2016
  8. londonkid

    londonkid

    control denial - let's let other people judge if they think calling a specific low of day in the spoos and saying a spike through of 16 ticks is possible. I said this would end badly for you.
     
    #28     Feb 17, 2016
  9. cbc1

    cbc1

    Not any oil charts yet londonkid? After speaking to you on chat I got a little more warmed up to the idea of trading oil.

    Heck, if I make some nice profit I guess I could say I owe you 1. XD
     
    #29     Feb 17, 2016
  10. londonkid

    londonkid

    hey cbc1. sorry you are probably not going to see any oil charts, unless it's longer time frame generic stuff. I don't want any problems with my nda. GL.
     
    #30     Feb 17, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.