the londonkid report

Discussion in 'Journals' started by londonkid, Feb 17, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    How do these three different calls with different levels relate to each other?
     
    #11     Feb 17, 2016
  2. londonkid

    londonkid

    in your opinion it is Dest. thing is it doesn't work like that does it, you know where you tell me what to do lol. heres the kicker. I actually pay for the full cqg front end and pro data. I have 2 x (2 x 2) screen setups at the firm/home but i actually prefer using free charts/software on my laptop. Once you have reached a certain level you don't need anything else.

    control denied. I trade how i want not the other way around.

    the TL is insignificant to you Dest. Here is the bind you will find yourself in. Traders bought off that TL from 1 hour after the open for a period of 5 hours. If you think the way those traders are positioned is insignificant to the participants that move price then you are mistaken. Either way that TL will get taken, yeah I am calling now but it may be later. Trust me the people that matter will not forget it is there. Sorry I showed you up today. bisous
     
    #12     Feb 17, 2016
    fortydraws likes this.
  3. destriero

    destriero

    So how long is that trend-line significant? An hour, week, month? Wouldn't you think that it's likely to be broken tonight, considering that even an hourly stat-vol or ATR during the EU-session is greater than 5 points? IOW, it's statistically, noise.

    Like your bottom at 84 that was taken out in two hours.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2016
    #13     Feb 17, 2016
  4. stepan7

    stepan7

    Agreed about 2000-2040 target, but we have some obstacles on the way up. :)

    ^SP500 (Daily)  1_12_2011 - 2_17_2016.jpg ^SP500 (Daily)  6_26_2015 - 2_17_2016 (2).jpg
     
    #14     Feb 17, 2016
  5. londonkid

    londonkid

    all I am saying nwurld is I believe we will see a pullback to around 1910 tomorrow and finish the week by hitting 1955 (all cash prices). The 1932 level is just where I think the move up in spoos is capped for the next few hours then we begin the move down towards 1910. Of course anything could happen, let's see.
     
    #15     Feb 17, 2016
  6. romik

    romik

    I don't know about 1910 or 1950, I see upside move hasn't completed yet. I sense another green day tomorrow.

    green.png
     
    #16     Feb 17, 2016
  7. stepan7

    stepan7

    ^SP500 (Weekly)  Week 46_2007 - Week 7_2016.jpg

    And weekly channel up isn't broken yet.
     
    #17     Feb 17, 2016
  8. londonkid

    londonkid

    look dude. I don't want a troll fest. I am going to control deny you, I know you are used to getting what you want but I am not going to answer your questions. If you cannot understand the difference between calling for a level to be hit and calling the low of day that's not my problem. I gave you the low of the day to 5 ticks, the direction and the high of day - you called bearish outside day. QED I have proof of you admitting you were wrong calling a bearish outside day. Let's just leave it there, save your blushes.

    It will just end up with you looking foolish. You have already stated that TL is insignificant, you are already backpedaling/slithering.
     
    #18     Feb 17, 2016
    fortydraws likes this.
  9. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    Okay.

    To clarify:

    you see 1930ish as a top this evening, 1910 by Friday and 1955 by the close on Friday 4pm.
    By the end of March, you see the spx hitting 2040.
     
    #19     Feb 17, 2016
  10. destriero

    destriero

    Of course the "25.70" (ES 24.00) TL is insignificant... as it's inside a 1HR stat-vol. You really think that a ES 24.00 trendline is going to hold? Even overnight? Further, it has nothing to do with 1910 before 1955. You can't hold the TL and achieve both figures; so what's the point of the trendline in light of your weekly analysis? A TL set 0.2% away from the market, lol.
     
    #20     Feb 17, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.