the londonkid report

Discussion in 'Journals' started by londonkid, Feb 17, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. londonkid

    londonkid

    look Magna has said this is not the londonkid vs destinies child thread. seriously what is the fascination. Nobody believes anything you say, if we do hit 1955 you will just come out with something like oh I meant Dow, I meant orange juice, I said it in the forum not the chat so it doesn't count. yada yada yada. It's plain for everyone dude you are just making yourself look dumber.
     
    #101     Feb 18, 2016
  2. destriero

    destriero


    I agree and I've not been hassling you. Mentioning "OJ" is a cop-out as you know 1955 is not in reach. That was a legit question. I've got literally thousands of calls with time stamps, so yeah, I will take issue with that claim.

    Confidence is not an edge. GL tomorrow.
     
    #102     Feb 18, 2016
    Chris Mac likes this.
  3. londonkid

    londonkid

    It doesn't matter what happens Dest your response will be the same. If we hit my 1955 spoos cash final target (yes it's cash) you will wriggle and crawl and twist out of it. It's a repeating pattern that's happened over and over and over again. If we hit 1950s you will be doing a lap of honour when everyone else will be thinking fcuk me that was close. If it really does matter that much to you, you are in for a sweaty for hours lol.
     
    #103     Feb 18, 2016
  4. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    Do you seriously think they will listen to you ? :D
     
    #104     Feb 18, 2016
  5. destriero

    destriero


    100%... if we hit 1955 cash (in the next 28 hours) -- I will be the first to congratulate you.
     
    #105     Feb 18, 2016
  6. romik

    romik

    I also see 1955 as a likely development, I just don't like being restrained by time.
     
    #106     Feb 18, 2016
  7. lower oil = lower es and vice versa

    but this smells like be a bear trap in oil and es
     
    #107     Feb 18, 2016
  8. Hopefully it goes lower so I can get back in long.

    I think SPX daily is doing the triangle approach, and then eventually the higher high W approach; typical moves of price, nothing new here. Once market knows it is not a triangle, it should continue moving higher.
     
    #108     Feb 18, 2016
  9. This 1922 in ES has been a decent S/R level going back to the highs on 2/4...the break above to test 1931 also was significant since it was the highest daily close from 2/1...just watching that spike bar last night into that level and noticing that it traded "weak" following that test was somewhat indicative of how the momentum has waned a bit from the short squeeze earlier in the week...Looks like a clustering of MA's down at 1893 level ES, which would also conveniently be a re-test of 1900 level cash...would not be surprised to see those tested before further upside.

    (btw, anyone else noticing the spooky similarities in price structure from early Oct...the 3 major price bars higher, stall on an inside day and then resume the squeeze higher...the analog would say its currently 10/6)
     
    #109     Feb 18, 2016
    Clubber Lang likes this.
  10. londonkid

    londonkid

    Dealers are holding net longs in us risk going into Asia.
     
    #110     Feb 18, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.