Noam Chomsky http://www.thenation.com/video/158093/noam-chomsky-how-climate-change-became-liberal-hoax
wow that guy is still a pointed headed idiot when he goes outside of his expertise. I thought he was going to explain that although we may be warming (or we may not) that warming precedes CO2 accumulation by 800 or so years. the election was the death knell of pointed headed socialists and politicans who were funding and chowing at the govt trough.
Yeah, pretty much. <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FfHW7KR33IQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WbLK4RZDdzI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kb9aA8JL0VI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_21b7mdJz2M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You can have the weatherman, Alex Jones and Al Gore, I'll side with Climatologists from NASA, NOAA and MIT. I don't guess anybody here is actually a climatologist right?
Apparently there was a memo directing that if you believe in a creator you are not allowed to use the scientific method, or accept its conclusions. The memo went on to state that if you value the scientific method you cannot believe in a creator (even secretly). I never got the memo.
Or even cause and effect, as in tidal events, unless miracles qualify as cause and effect. The profit motive, in the wrong hands, is going to get us all killed or at least our descendants.
is noam chomsky a climate scientist? are his methods backing his statements free of unreasonable bias? wouldn't he be the definition of the appeal to expert fallacy when outside his field of linquistics? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
But his office is probably right around the corner from a team of PHD's who've worked on and are far more respectable a source than anything anyone here has close. Everyone here is operating from faith in their source unless somebodies been to Antartica, pulled up ice samples from different epochs and examined them for gaseous content themselves. You didn't do that did you?