I look at the two major parties as managers that both report to the same VP, the big money elite that owns the corporation. The politicians try to do what they can in the framework of where they are. The thing is, the Republicans can advance socialism and unfunded liabilities and increased debt with relative impunity because the people on the right are less prone to all out attack on other conservatives and the Democrats can advance any business agenda of the big money guys for the same reason. Big Oil grew best with Democrats in charge and the environuts that blocked all Nuclear energy development allowed Big Oil to keep on keepin' on and corner the market on nuclear fuel for later. We will have to pay for energy forever when the earth was trying to give it to us for 2 cents a kwhr. God helps the little guy, were it not for that there wouldn't be any left probably.
Very troubling that you believe this.... Looks like you believe juuuuust enough of the liberal lies to throw some doubt in there. I'm telling you, look deeper into some things - liberal backing points will quote someone, who was quoting someone else, who was quoting someone else, who will be quoting a hit piece in the NYT. Very little first person investigation will be done. THAT'S the difference between the 2. Liberals tell a lie to cover up another lie. And then they repeat it ad infinitum until conservatives give up and quit arguing the point. ANd when the conservatives quit arguing the point, the liberals now take this as proof that they were telling the truth all along..... All the lies about McCarthy is a perfect example. Most people don't know the truth. He was a brute. He "named names". Etc. All lies. He was ordered by the Senate to "name names". Ordered, even though he didn't want to, because by his own omission - and this is part of the public record that the press never bothers to look up - he may be wrong about some of these people and he didn't want to ruin anybody's career if he was wrong. But you won't read that in history books will we? Also in the history books, they tell our kids that he never "outed" any Communists. Lie...... to our kids....... liberals do that to make themselves look better. Think hard about that one. They write the history books. They are our university professors. Our school teachers. Our tv personalities. Our magazine and newspaper editors. And they lie to our kids.
Very troubling that you believe this.... Looks like you believe juuuuust enough of the liberal lies to throw some doubt in there. I'm telling you, look deeper into some things - liberal backing points will quote someone, who was quoting someone else, who was quoting someone else, who will be quoting a hit piece in the NYT. Very little first person investigation will be done. THAT'S the difference between the 2. Liberals tell a lie to cover up another lie. And then they repeat it ad infinitum until conservatives give up and quit arguing the point. ANd when the conservatives quit arguing the point, the liberals now take this as proof that they were telling the truth all along..... All the lies about McCarthy is a perfect example. Most people don't know the truth. He was a brute. He "named names". Etc. All lies. He was ordered by the Senate to "name names". Ordered, even though he didn't want to, because by his own omission - and this is part of the public record that the press never bothers to look up - he may be wrong about some of these people and he didn't want to ruin anybody's career if he was wrong. But you won't read that in history books will we? Also in the history books, they tell our kids that he never "outed" any Communists. Lie...... to our kids....... liberals do that to make themselves look better. Think hard about that one. They write the history books. They are our university professors. Our school teachers. Our tv personalities. Our magazine and newspaper editors. And they lie to our kids.
Im sure the right wing fundementalist religious police will try to have this removed..but here is something we can all agree to __________________ Please, I'm not a daytrader, I'm an "Intraday Liquidity Provider" 1-888-TRADEUP
Rubbish. Don't you know, the very FIRST thing an invading army does is to take control of the media outlets. If you dare to look you will see our media is tighly contolled and owned by a small cartel...it is not free by any standard. Look at the movie and TV content that pollutes kids minds, look closely at the credits. You'll see the same familiar names. And same cartel own the print and news media. Make no mistake, bush as a regime leader will have secured control of the media and those who run it. Unless you mean to tell me he is the first regime leader to not control the media?
I don't know who you're referring to on this board, but speaking for myself, it is nice indeed to have found common ground with you on something.
If it weren't for the fact that you appreciate beautiful women, I'd consider you a completely hopeless moonbat.
Interesting.......of course it follows, that if the statement is correct, and you were in fact on the right, it would only be possible to describe your realtionship to your brain situation as either; "brain left- dead", or "left - brain dead", neither particularly flattering to the right. I thought "the left 'are' brain dead" would be correct grammar?