Greenspan (mr. liquidity) Milton (deregulation) The Rothschilds (globalists) Soros (owner of the democratic party) . . . "They" didn't get along with the Romans, the Germans nor the Palastinians. Anybody that thinks Hitler didn't have a point is a fool. One is simply not allowed to say it. Are they all out of step except for my son Jacob?
wolfowitz, perle, feith "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
Shouldn't you be busy polishing your head? And do be sure to visit your dentist more often, as mouth breathing promotes tooth decay.
Quite witty, however, you'll be driving kykes out of this country with the rest of us. You'd be amazed how quickly sentiment can turn. It happened once, it can happen again.
Look Mr Adolf decided jews were expendable and it was one of the reasons why Germany did NOT get to NUKE first. Anti-semitism is not a productive feeling, it simply is not. Society benefits a lot more from people like Charles Schumer than from people like Kevin Federline. NB I decided not to address the morality question for the simple reason that people who make posts like the original poster don't care about moral implications of hating someone simply because of nationality/religion.