This is a question that only has meaning in the specific context of someone who thinks as the maker of this foolish video does. Such a person is dangerous to those who are susceptible to illogic. From the viewpoint of many "believers" and non-believers alike, we, of our species, all have the inalienable right to love, and to fall in love with, those who love us. This is an inalienable right and therefore is not the province of either religion or government. Whether someone falls in love with another of opposite or same gender, they do not lose this inalienable right, nor do they, or can they, lose it because they later change their mind. The impossibility of losing an inalienable right is embodied within the definition of "inalienable." Those who would take this right away are universally and categorically wrong if they attempt to do so. Their efforts will create animosity and strife in the short run and are doomed to failure in the longer run.
Spot on. In the all the confused illogicality of unreasoning proselytizing evangelicals like expiated and studentofthemarkets, comments like Captain Obvious's seem to provide them with distorted ideas enough to allow their imaginary God concept to transform into something possible, when of course it really does no such thing. Lightning was at one time currently beyond our ability to comprehend. That didn't make Zeus possible either.