Well yes, studies have suggested and logic deduces that the heat is being absorbed into the oceans over the last 16 years or so. There is no doubt that the temp fluctuations are partially due to the Pacific oscillation and that the vast majority of the earth's heat content is in the oceans. Some of the heat may also be being reflected back into space from high altitude SO2 from coal fired plants in the developing nations.
More foolishness from the AGW Alarmist. Your numbers have dwindled and honest scientists aren't playing your game anymore. They realize CO2 is not a problem. I really love how you AGW Alarmists now say COAL is responsible for global cooling. LOL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html
No. YOU, are not too bright. You have to read instructions on how to boil water. It's ok, you can ask us. We won't laugh at you. Publicly. See how that works? LOL
Yes, and the moon landing was faked. The fact is that CO2 levels have gone up 35% in the last 150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How could that NOT make temps go up? It's a very simple common sense thing......... that the fossil fuel industry doesn't want you to think about. The science is settled. 97% of the world's climatologists and all the world's science organizations are in agreement about it. The deniers just look foolish now.
If you say so. I know you'll believe anything. Did your mother tell you that you were hatched from an egg, too? Perhaps the most inconvenient fact is the lack of global warming for well over 10 years now. This is known to the warming establishment, as one can see from the 2009 "Climategate" email of climate scientist Kevin Trenberth: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html
Then lets approve those coal fired power plants, dumbass. If they create global cooling it would be foolish not to burn our vast coal reserves! Right? Morons!
if you read the footnotes to the 2007 UN model you will see the scientists state the system was too complex to show CO2 was forcing warming. As I have read your crap over the years... I am not sure I have ever read any scientists state they can show man made CO2 forces warming on earth. So what scientists are you referring to? I have no problem if a scientist says mans activities may have an effect on warming. I am pretty sure cutting down the rain forest and planting crops would have an effect.
What are you on drugs? Or just as I suspect, insane. 97% of the world's climate scientists and all it's science organization say that man's emissions of the greenhouse gas CO2 has caused the earth to warm. What part of that don't you understand? So which don't you believe?: CO2 is a greenhouse gas?, or that CO2 has increased due to man (mostly by the burning of fossil fuels) by some 35% over the last 150 years. You are one fucked-up dude.