The Great Global Warming Swindle

Most of us don't like to complain about the mistakes of the mentally challenged such as yourself.

 

DONE!

 

I only hit the complain button for obvious commercial spam. I would hope that you have the ability to self moderate yourself to not violate the normal etiquette in a public forum.

 

Actually, I don't typically alter what's inside the quote lines. I would rather have copied your text, pasted it outside, and added the word. But, too late to change it.

I would have kept your formatting, though. You have an eye for color and arrangement, do you sell flowers?

 

the co2 dip was preceded by the dip in antartic temperatures.

look all this is in the data which has been analyzed through dozens of studies by agw nutters.

Temps lead the accumulation and then the dissipation of CO2.

That is why your your nutters tried to develop computer models showing CO2 was forcing temps in modern times.

Those models have failed.

You team is back doing research trying to come up with a new theory.

I predict it will be some sort of partial forcing or let me coin this... Symbiotic Forcing.

If they are smart there will define (Symbiotic Forcing. Trademark... JEM 2013) in a way the will prevent real research from distinguishing the work done by real drivers like sun and tides.

 

One thing is for sure:

Other factors than CO2 easily overrules any forcing from CO2. Only this way can the situations with high CO2 lead to falling temperatures.

This is essential, because, the whole idea of placing CO2 in a central role for driving temperatures was: We cannot explain the big changes in temperature with anything else than CO2.

But simple fact is: No matter what rules temperature, CO2 is easily overruled by other effects, and this CO2-argument fails. So we are left with graphs showing that CO2 follows temperatures, and no arguments that CO2 could be the main driver of temperatures.

<img src=http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/lansner-image3.png?w=640>

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/01/30/co2-temperatures-and-ice-ages/

Facts are NOT your friend, futurecurrent.

 

Here's a fact....

 

You say......"the co2 dip was preceded by the dip in antartic temperatures. "


which chart are YOU looking at? I think you've gone off the deep end. Your argument that CO2 was never shown to lead temps is now null and void. End of story. Accept it and move on.

 

You're kind of a name calling little Bitch aren't you?

This is fun, I get to use this obsessed asshole like a punching bag whenever I feel like my testosterone needs a little boost...

His arguments are not about reason. He uses appeals to experts, ad hominims, circular reasoning, and simple repetition designed to wear down the opposition.. he probably has it all programmed on function keys, maybe gets paid by the word by moveon.org...

 

So moron. Aside from the Ad hominem attack, do you have any actual scientific argument? NO? Didn't think so. Moron righties don't do science.