please tell me how you know CO2 caused the secondary warming as opposed to the same drivers which caused the antartic warming or the antartic warming itslef driving the rest of the warming via ocean currents. Again what we know is warming in the antartic preceded the CO2 accumulation... what you are guessing is that eventually the CO2 became a driver.
Of course it became a driver. It's a greenhouse gas. And notice the dip? It perfectly precedes a dip in the temps. If temps were leading CO2 the opposite would occur. Just like today. The CO2 has rocketed up from man and so the temps are also rising.
Poor FC... He simply does not get that.... Continuously chanting the global warming mantra is no different than the radicalism taught in a Pakistani madrasa; both are destructive to society, are not based on science, and representative of cognitive failure.
You really have to wonder about the cognitive abilities of the denier morons. It's such a simple cause-effect relationship. A rising greenhouse gas causes rising temps and we're seeing them. Bigtime. But they don't understand. I mean, how stupid are they? I'm sure it must be due to political ideology. They just can't admit both that they are wrong and the "left" is right.
Yeah, it is same that Ricter does not understand that altering someone's quote is against the moderation policy on ET & most forums.... as well as being totally discourteous to the original poster in the context of public conversations. Apparently Ricter does not have enough cognitive ability to use ET Code to create color and size formating on his own.