One of your purported 77 "climatologists" does not even have a scientific degree. What is the magical criteria to be declared a "climatologist"?
So 377, now that you've learned that the CO2 has gone up 35% and it is from man, what do YOU expect should happen with temps?
This was easy,,,,Google,,,you should try it and learn things. Climatologists work for state and federal governments as weather station network supervisors, computer programmers, and supervisors of climate data publications. Some are private consultants that provide expert advice or testimony for clients, including companies involved in construction, litigation, insurance, utilities, and agribusiness. Climatologists at universities teach climate courses and participate in multi-disciplinary extension and research activities. To be a climatologist, you need a strong background in math and physics. Courses in meteorology and climatology, as well as courses in agricultural, biological, computer, or natural sciences are part of the coursework. You need broad educational experience, because the users of climate information come from varied backgrounds. For most private consulting and many government jobs, you need a master's or doctoral degree.
Are you so fucking arrogant as to expect us to blithely accept your 1 supposedly independent variable and come to your conclusion about the expected outcome of a dependent variable in a complex system? Please nobody that's had 6th grade science should accept that nonsense, yet idiot experts and talking heads on TV do it all the time. Try blowing smoke up my ass, you'll have better luck. I'll eat some eggs , chili just to make it tasty for you
FC, your entire selection of data, scientific opinion and forecasts have been totally debunked. Much of it is total fraud. Stop being so hard headed and rethink your position.
So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks, when they donât publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues, when they have to manipulate the data to support their point, then what theyâre doing isnât science.