And has been pointed out many times: There was never in the past the release of 8 billion tons per year of CO2 like there is now. In the past the CO2 levels acted as the greenhouse gas that they are after they were released, extending and amplifying the small solar changes. There is no question about this. The forcing capability of CO2 can be determined fairly accurately via the historical records. The fact that there may be no clear instance where CO2 STARTS the temp rise does NOT mean CO2 is a not a dominant greenhouse gas and given the conditions we see today can be expected to LEAD temp higher.
"The current CO2 level and global temperature levels are well within the standard deviation of the mean over the long term on earth." Well the earth used to be molten ball of lava also. What we are interested in is somewhat recent changes. Like within the last 400,000 years.
you just proved my point.. considering how much I wanted Romney to win could my analysis of what a professional poll was have been better? "polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver. polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind. even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008. poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008. polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart. but IMO polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us. all these pollsters... underweighted the Is."
Could you type that again? You were consistently wrong throughout your thread and your analysis for the lack of a better word was a sick joke.
We started comment on polls when many of the polls early on were slanted to the dems by 11 to 24 points. I predicted that by election time they were go to more balanced ratios. I was completely correct... And just so clowns did not think it was about predicting a winner I made that post... in which I explained that Professional polls would be using a model or a template that should either be based on the 2008 or 2010 or election or somewhere in between. I explained that I felt 2008 was slanted left and 2010 might also be a bit partisan. so it turned out... the poll model I stated was professional got the election exactly right. Now personally I was hoping for a turnout far more R than what a professional poll would have modeled. I was trying to read the tea leaves and hoping the Independents were going to turn out big for Romney. And for a while after the 1st debate it was polling that way... but the Independents flipped back in some of the on the polls just in front of the election.
As expected 'global warming' is just a liberal scam so they have to work less hours. Study: Global Warming Can Be Slowed By Working Less http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/02/04/-study-global-warming-can-be-slowed-by-working-less A worldwide switch to a "more European" work schedule, which includes working fewer hours and more vacation time, could prevent as much as half of the expected global temperature rise by 2100, according to the analysis, which used a 2012 study that found shorter work hours could be associated with lower carbon emissions. Add this to the list of laughable studies that promote the global warming agenda.
Ah yes, the AGENDA. The one that 97% of the worlds climatologists are in on. To ruin the FF industry, make Al Gore richer, to stifle the economy, to let the UN control us and to prove that the deniers (mostly Republicans) are indeed morons. Must fight the AGENDA. The one that says that if the dominant greenhouse gas goes up 35%, things will get warmer. That crazy, common-sense, AGENDA. You're truly delusional.
Where are your links to your three studies showing 97% of the world's climatologists support man-made global warming? You claim you posted them before - you have not. Probably due to the reason that studies showing 97% don't exist. It is a magical number the global warming promoters pulled out of their rear ends.