Okay, you've formed a theory, now you have to explain why temperatures don't drop during solar minimums.
You really need me to define what the greenhouse effect is? "The greenhouse effect is the heating of the surface of a planet or moon due to the presence of an atmosphere containing gases that absorb and emit infrared radiation." So CO2 is responsible for an estimated 3 or 4% of the total warming effect. Water vapor is estimated to contribute 95% of the total warming effect.
Unfortunately naturally produced CO2 has been naturally absorbed, too, thus an equilibrium was established. Some man made CO2 was absorbed, but not all of it, and what was absorbed has helped acidify the oceans. Let's say your numbers were right (and they're not, they're far too low since CO2 has increased at least 20% since 1970 alone) -- take whatever annual numbers you have and multiply them by ten years, then twenty years, then fifty years. Who cares? Lots of people will. Probably the safest choice for you.
Yes, about the proposals for action. "The IPCC produces also Special Reports; Methodology Reports; Technical Papers; and Supporting Material, often in response to requests from the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, or from other environmental Conventions." Can you figure out which ones might address water vapor? (Hell, I previously even gave you the page numbers.)
What exactly do you mean by "total warming effect"? Total increase in temperature? If not, what then? You did know that humans are partially responsible for increases in water vapor, in methane, and in other greenhouse gases, right?
Where did you get this nonsense number? I hope you're not trying to discuss stratospheric water vapor. Here are the actual numbers in W/sq. meters: http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/FAQ/wg1_faq-2.1.html CO2 has a radiative forcing effect of over 1.5W/sq. meters, while H2O is less than .2W/sq. meter. Suffice to say, your thought that CO2 only is responsible for 3 or 4% of total radiative forcing is wildly wrong.
No, idiot. Cuz the IPCC graph shows no increase during the MWP and the LIA. Face it troll, Huang's work debunks the IPCC graph.
Why is this so difficult to understand? The greenhouse effect causes some quantity of energy to be absorbed at the surface of the earth which then increases the surface of the earth. I am talking about the percentage of this total energy that each individual gas contributes. Yes and my point is if you do the math humans CO2 contribution only increases the greenhouse effect by about 0.2%.