Except that everything that he wrote was false. Let's take it point by point: Here's the problem, the only person I could find who was actually an author who wanted their name removed was Lindzen, and that wasn't even for the current IPCC report, but the one ten years ago. The articles from various strange websites claimed that various "reviewers" asked to have their names removed -- but anyone could sign up to be a reviewer. You could be a reviewer simply by submitting your name. That's not the same as being an author and is meaningless. Professor James McCarthy, co-chair of Working Group II for the IPCCâs Third Assessment Report (2001) has reported (see: http://tinyurl.com/2ax9p4, PDF) that: "Neither [the heads of the SAR and TAR Technical Support Units] nor I can recall a single instance ⦠of even one author having âresignedâ." There are two problems with this: firstly, NASA hasn't called Hansen's work crap. Secondly, I'm not sure how you got the misinformation that somehow all the global temperature readings were based on his temperature information, when the UK's CRA also reached the same conclusion from temperature measurements around the globe. Actually the only people quoting NASA's temperature measures of the troposphere (which have high error rates) are climate change skeptics, as can be seen in this thread. Five problems with this: cherry picking random dates which don't relate to the start of the industrial revolution, such as 1970, the fact that solar activity has decreased since 1950 (and increased from 1900), your ignoring the fact that temperature has been rising even during the solar minimums which we're at now, the fact that you've turned around that NASA is suddently, neck-snappingly credible, and your ignoring that NASA states that although this has an effect it does not have the majority effect.
CO2 does not, in itself, generate heat. Yes, higher temperatures can release CO2 but again, when we're discussing naturally generated CO2 other factors are at play as well. What mankind has done is to skip right to the CO2 increase which compounds and amplifies atmospheric heat retention.
wow, drj hired monkeys to think up and type his posts. this isn't a spelling problem. You responses and your word comprehension belie someone who is not academically inclined.
No, my point was to stop Jekyll from his tactic of trying to make it seem as if this was some sort of fringe nonsense. Every country in the world except the US signed the Kyoto treaty, after all. For the rest, see bigdave's treatment of your nonsensical ad hominems about the IPCC report. You're nothing but another liar.
I tell you what: before I tear apart your water vapor assholery, explain to all of us how that would be a first mover for global warming. I'd love to see that one.
drj basically subscribes to "yell loudly" when one has nothing much. That is all I am getting out of his posts. His spelling is not accidental, he really does not grasp how to spell some big words. It is very similar to his grasp of research and science. Fringe elements here are demanding to know why everyone accepts overwhelming evidence. Their only defense is to attack the mainstream and flout unsupported ideas, rather that disproving it.
Calling someone a liar when there has been no lie told. Interesting. What do you not understand about the finding from Vostock Station?