The Global Warming Hoax is falling apart

No, the analogy is: would I want to take a medication that has been approved for use by its manufacturer and no one else.

There are easy ways to identify politicized science that is unlikely to hold value:

1) Science about climatology produced by astrophysicists or other non-experts in the field.

2) Scientists from the oil and tobacco industries.

The 138 countries of the IPCC claim it exists.

The G-8 countries claim it exists.

NASA claims there's a consensus among scientists.

97% of specialists in the field surveyed agreeing indicates a consensus.

So discredit the "talking points."

The debate about whether something should be done is a separate argument.

 

Nobody ever questioned this fact on this forum as far as I know.

Yeah, yeah, we all know this. You wrote once that humans had contributed to medieval warming in Europe through burning fire-camps and through deforestation.

Now, can you also state that humans contributed to warming in tropics and Australia 1,000 years ago? If yes, how did they manage to achieve this? Fire-camps / deforestation / other?

 

Link to what I wrote please.

Link to where I wrote this, please.

Additionally, your argument is called a fallacy of composition where one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole.

 

bigavediode, Your talking points have been discredited repeatedly in this thread and elsewhere. You just continue to post away pretending they are true. And it works. They sound plausible to the uninformed. Most people dont have the time or interest to run down your endless misstatements.

Anyway, this is pointless. You have confused a few people but most see through you. Or maybe it is the other way around.
These days, who knows?

 

William Gray is not 96 years old and he does not have dementia. Nice try.

 

Lets just watch this month by month and keep it real. Bigdave will certainly oppose this approach.

 

Frederick Seitz is nearly 100 and yes, he does have dementia.

William Gray is 80 years old and labors under beliefs, such as his belief about the thermohaline circulation, which are 50 years out of date.

 

Then give just one example.

 

In case you haven't noticed it is 30 years of data and how did I know that you would be opposed to the idea.

 

William Gray has more knowledge about climate in his little finger than you have in your entire body times 100.