To the pompous BS spam artist: Here you go rationalizing your own fantasy world again without providing any evidence for your claims whatsoever. Microsoft has never innovated any successful product, show me one, just one..... You have claim to have done your research, yet you still cannot NAME THE ONE MAGIC MS PRODUCT out of the alleged 10,000. Again no mention of what specific successful product MS innovated..... Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser: I see that you must lie to yourself to maintain your delusions. The proof of Microsoft's innovations is clearly documented in their 10,000+ patents. What part of that don't you understand? Have an adult read and explain them to to you. No rational person could possibly believe there's no innovation in 10,000+ patents. Microsoft's success and innovations must have made you insane with envy. Your delusion is laughable: "software patents exist because lawyers figured out a way around the rules" As if those few words somehow nullify the innovation in 10,000+ patents. ROTFLMAO!!!! Have you thought about getting professional help?
To the pompous BS spam artist: rationalizing again.... Microsoft has never innovated any successful product, show me one, just one..... There is not any original successful high revenue/profitable product according to the MS annual report. It's your claim, but you can't even name 1 out of 10,000 lol. What a joke. Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser: Oh please... get professional help for your GRAND DELUSION that there's no innovation in Microsoft's 10,000+ patents. No rational person could possibly believe it. Microsoft's success and innovations must have made you insane with envy. Maybe you need a psychiatrist to explain to you what 10,000+ patents means. Please get professional help for your GRAND DELUSION.
To the pompous BS spam artist: Microsoft has copied others, that is the reason for their success. Quite some fantasy world that you have created. STILL NOT ANY MENTION OF ONE SUCCESSFUL INNOVATION. You don't even have the capacity to make a thoughtful argument. Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.
To the jaded, jealous, ignorant loser: Justify your GRAND DELUSION that there's no innovation in Microsoft's 10,000+ patents. "Microsoft has copied others" doesn't negate the innovation behind 10,000+ patents. Please get professional help for your GRAND DELUSION.
To the pompous BS spam artist: You keep avoiding the question, where is the one successful innovated product? Name all the great Microsoft innovations..... Until you do so, you are an outright fraud.
You are pretty stupid for saying Microsoft is not innovative. They made the PC possible. Operating Systems were needed even before software could be developed. You're mental for thinking that's not an innovation, and was not copied by anyone.
Microsoft did not invent the operating system, by any means. Windows, that's a joke right? So 86-DOS, CP/M and Xerox had no influence on MS whatsoever? hmmm >Bill gates did not innovate anything for MS. Microsoft's original OS DOS was 86-DOS created by Seattle Computer Products. Microsoft bought out the rights to the OS, that is some real "innovation". Microsoft then created a gui for the system, Let's discuss the gui, the first was featured on the Xerox Alto OS. Xerox then introduced the Star, which then was copied and fitted by both Apple and then MS. Microsoft become wealthy through its licensing strategy and its right to sell pc, to companies other than IBM, that was fatal mistake for IBM. MS then created tons of code built on top of the original DOS, so that programs would continue to function with each new version of Windows. Microsoft copies other people's software and incorporates to Windows. MS still uses the same NTFS file system. Microsoft then created an office suite, which had features copied from Lotus 1-2-3 and Word Perfect office software and then offered bundled discounts to oems for essentially the same software MS office. Microsoft's browser IE was based on Mosaic, their founders then founded Netscape. Microsoft copied features from the browser and only supported at a minimum what Netscape supported to stay relevant and bundled it with the OS, while giving discounts to oems. Microsoft did not add any new features to IE essentially until Mozilla Firefox become a considerable in the browser market a couple years ago. Directx was a modified copy originally of Opengl. All that Microsoft has built up from DOS-windows-explorer is built into vista and now 7 .NET is copying java, visual studio copied the developer IDE from those previously created at Borland and sqlserver is just an RDBMS like oracle, DB2 etc Xbox (a pet project) is simply another game console, zune another mp3 player, WinMo, MSN (default IE homepage) etc and all are second or third rate competitors Not to mention webtv, zune, SPoT, Encarta, msn search, Live Search, PlaysForSure and many others which have all failed. All MS can do is suck the public dry with their monopoly and anti-competitive oem practices, and blow some of their excess profits on Ad campaigns that are irrelevant anyway. All of Microsoft's innovation was previously created by other corporations, Microsoft just took the same principles and features present in that other software/embedded devices/hardware and rebranded it and filed patents and copyrights. The windows tcp/ip comes from BSD, Microsoft then implemented and patented their own version. Software patents exist because lawyers figured out a way around the rules, by describing the computing device within the patent, Microsoft creates new lines of code to add on to previously made products like Windows, Office and IE for example, while only on occasion make significant improvements. Those MS patents are for services and products related to MS' crown jewel monopoly (new lines of code and a plethora of other products that have failed or are essentially theoretical proprietary implementation's from other companies that have actually innovated.